[Tools-discuss] Re: Non-delivery of complaint
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 13 September 2024 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BDBC15106F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qsXtamnxUPYv for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C31AC14F738 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.49.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 48DH1bcw029941 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1726246908; x=1726333308; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Lx9j5TGLNDec7YkuOiirxbdneyIX6aKAyuyzKQ19TLo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cq3TGwtuLy21IPy3u2kdPJjCZ0AxAs/ZZLoGakQCg2rYitROQJiq4OE6y4qoBnvsj ILfTg3l1kmdMz4LWRN7v+t4H4L51u3d4GQfUWPC7gwlaNQuvIhwByKLArFv1OWcnim pnn9EPKmm9/yq9z82BH31zoEwSAApvejXdh0aGIM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20240913095805.0e11ef80@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:00:36 -0700
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a09d7f3-2df8-438f-9a5d-394fa9fb7af8@nostrum.com>
References: <20240906153539.175371.qmail@cr.yp.to> <2D88ED20-0F61-4EFD-AE36-AF93E2D00729@juniper.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20240911233314.099ec718@elandnews.com> <c6f97d26-2f92-4adb-a33d-a234960ae86c@nostrum.com> <3a09d7f3-2df8-438f-9a5d-394fa9fb7af8@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: KPNDX42XGDQU2QW62FXRQLUPECTRG2VB
X-Message-ID-Hash: KPNDX42XGDQU2QW62FXRQLUPECTRG2VB
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Non-delivery of complaint
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/1ySWGw4bsJX62ol80GeJH5RZc9M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Robert, At 07:40 AM 13-09-2024, Robert Sparks wrote: >That did turn out to be the case. This particular message used an >envelope From that was not yet confirmed, was challenged by >postconfirm, and the challenge was never successfully answered. The >sender has since sent other messages successfully to the IESG. Thanks for sharing the above information. Regards, S. Moonesamy
- [Tools-discuss] Non-delivery of complaint (was: [… S Moonesamy
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Non-delivery of complaint Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Non-delivery of complaint Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Non-delivery of complaint S Moonesamy