[Tools-discuss] Slow
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 01 August 2024 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ED7C180B4C for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 06:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GhMMz0B6ujoB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 06:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2522C1CAE66 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 06:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dc419.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.196.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WZVN96MgVzDCfX; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:35:42 +0200
Message-Id: <F32993DF-F8CC-4EC9-A67C-2A0D0EEFBC9C@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
Message-ID-Hash: 6Y7XLN55T5YEG4UWSUWEWSXO3CQI7BNP
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6Y7XLN55T5YEG4UWSUWEWSXO3CQI7BNP
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Slow
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/3KI29x2n8a21WjERkUcoDYN3i7M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
RFC editor, Data tracker, authorinfo... slow. As in 9.67 s for a *reload* of an (“HTMLized”) I-D (real HTML from ietf.org <http://ietf.org/> is normally fast, 130 ms for a 13.2 kB cache refresh). Last week, it wasn’t great either, but I thought maybe this was due to all the IETF 120 traffic. But we should be back to normal now? Grüße, Carsten
- [Tools-discuss] Slow Carsten Bormann