[Tools-discuss] Datatracker question

[Bob Hinden <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I belatedly went to the datatracker to change the state of a draft to “Call for Adoption by WG”.  The call for adoption had been done two weeks earlier.

Much to my surprise the datatracker, besides changing the state as expected, sent a new adoption call to the list.  See below.

Why did the happen?  It didn’t give me any indication that it was going to do this.   How do I turn it off?  When was this introduced?

Bob


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Bob Hinden via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Call for adoption: draft-zhang-6man-ipv6-address-resolution-yang-00 (Ends 2025-09-05)
> Date: August 22, 2025 at 11:38:44 AM PDT
> To: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
> Resent-From: <[e-mail]>
> Resent-To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
> Reply-To: Bob Hinden <[e-mail]>
> 
> 
> Subject: Call for adoption: draft-zhang-6man-ipv6-address-resolution-yang-00 
> (Ends 2025-09-05)
> 
> This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document.
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines a YANG data model to configure and manage IPv6
>   Neighbor Discovery (ND) and related functions, including IPv6 address
>   resolution, redirect function, proxy Neighbor Advertisement, Neighbor
>   Unreachability Detection (NUD), Duplicate Address Detection (DAD),
>   SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND), and Secure ND Proxy.
> 
> File can be retrieved from:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-6man-ipv6-address-resolution-yang/
> 
> Please reply to this message keeping [e-mail] in copy by indicating
> whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
> Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated.
> 
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
> found at [3].
> 
> Thank you.
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> 
>