Re: [Tools-discuss] emailing authors of an RFC

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 June 2019 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDAA120178 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdasxR83yH0z for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F6D120196 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CCF380BE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:51:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D6A18F4A; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D226691B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <31204.1560354351@localhost>
References: <20190612150100.84AF538185@tuna.sandelman.ca> <31204.1560354351@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:52:34 -0400
Message-ID: <616.1560354754@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/5F_WltuGfdQU2S0HpeJSTXqENFM>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] emailing authors of an RFC
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:52:59 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > The page at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7030/ has an email button
    > that generates:
    > draft-ietf-pkix-est@ietf.org

BTW, I think that we want to encourage people to use the aliases @ietf.org
for authors for three reasons:

1) I think that it will indirect through DT database, so if an author changes
   their email, it should follow them?

2) we can include WG chairs, WG lists, or BIS authors, or other people, particularly
   we can also keep people from spamming authors if necessary.
   (particularly authors who have moved on)

3) we can archive things if that makes sense, or even bring request trackers
   into the loop if it seems appropriate in the future.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-