Re: [Tools-discuss] Revision display inconsistency

Peter Thomassen <peter@desec.io> Tue, 21 June 2022 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@desec.io>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5146FC0D7C86 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=a4a.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gwr-GXVh3Tow for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.a4a.de (mail.a4a.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:1d5c:8000::8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2A0C15AE28 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a4a.de; s=20170825; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ABEX3utrIB8qcHXgOYGq/kW89h6UMgZoUJglyhGAx5M=; b=QDfVwuH+ym4CbQBdp6upp2/tk0 IFqlB/do4l3ucVyk1jKow+pe1SdxsCPMOW6Nzt6oMhGsxKvYBxli+stT3UGZj+5bOEL6noEqa5QDc IJbzTPrSByyIwMMLqHYvkfYnK2U6yCu2XODaPrLpvbPlMwyEoDHsive/aUFnfK1p9/uNDjMh4VCdd A/dBBxomdjezM7n19rOT85tSnxdLzXk3s14LyhmHpBy9Gsn+b3I9YYBTaA7E/psP5jU7Eb+VjIA/i N9WB/fp5okqeLGx5KA09s4+d7WghXCArLmdPHH4o9AtixdRtczj0z9cP6+keFzOpYyd/aAbponWoK 4V/OWPaw==;
Received: from ip5b415f1d.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.65.95.29] helo=[192.168.178.70]) by mail.a4a.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <peter@desec.io>) id 1o3ZwA-0006ke-OD; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:12:42 +0200
Message-ID: <a272b3a8-311a-d8bc-9c86-a6c74d0c2e86@desec.io>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:12:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <4005f4bf-19c5-7f03-4938-64e7cd78d750@desec.io> <0b9f6fdc-88ef-8ccd-7ca3-cdca48a83b05@nostrum.com>
From: Peter Thomassen <peter@desec.io>
In-Reply-To: <0b9f6fdc-88ef-8ccd-7ca3-cdca48a83b05@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/5cYEpM6dxpJO3SJwhMfHYvoKv3U>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:06:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Revision display inconsistency
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:12:50 -0000

Hi,

I believe I was logged in at the time, because it was only a few minutes after I submitted the draft, and I did not log out explicitly. But I don't know whether that happened through some other mechanism (e.g. when the session times out after only a few minutes?).

It was not a browser cache issue. (I checked with another browser, without logging in.)

Best,
Peter


On 6/19/22 17:53, Robert Sparks wrote:
> The colored timeline appears correct now.
> 
> Do you remember if you were logged into the datatracker at the time? (It affects where things are cached).
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> On 6/17/22 5:20 AM, Peter Thomassen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I uploaded revision -01 of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/. The page now includes the new version of the TXT rendering at the bottom, but the colored timeline at the top does not have -01 yet. I suspect this is a caching issue (it's been like that for 15 minutes now).
>>
>> Not sure if this is the right place for this; I figured I should drop it here.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>>

-- 
https://desec.io/