Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits tool strangeness
Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EA821F9A24 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6O7Hp38Ns0SY for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22b.google.com (mail-vb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29E121F9A23 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q13so2746636vbe.16 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=6ApUdN7O7cQMVRrbL4MYnPcCMPvefjsxQxf3V/qZ7Jc=; b=rKipJrePzoQhhTn9GGBFNziTwDD00faaF0Pn5j8KdLeRuPwvvn2n9zRGTO2WhTuGKl Ze8cXdhZ2XkmdeSBxKbwZTrIR1Ucdi2FHnOZb9NQwIzAtE8coFpF0FHRV0t4HG/1jwG1 GrnDOLrQaUOLn//yIC39St9OANRktB4M27BnORsWNHE0CndCEdsa2zoGRuliK1u3p43p 6SazKz82R2bm9vNossNykQoCHAkSd9rDMiqrYfVRb9+ZcaWg7z7WX4mQh1eJdWr3nsuB nXXL5ihc/nLW2oyrRMTS+oZAS9NBxI+r3j6nM9x7FqDWmyGckHAPeRlHkZIrxKzRcjfE F3Nw==
X-Received: by 10.52.186.69 with SMTP id fi5mr24896771vdc.105.1366994999201; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.35] (c-24-130-151-138.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.151.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a17sm3386668vdj.2.2013.04.26.09.49.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0FE055C8-AD6D-4355-98B2-0E874A0C16FB@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:51 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1B529406-06BB-4F3A-A4FE-C37CF954D8CE@gmail.com>
References: <0FE055C8-AD6D-4355-98B2-0E874A0C16FB@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits tool strangeness
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:50:00 -0000
I have seen something similar to this, but never got around to reporting it. I usually run it again and it goes away. Bob On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > Something is not right about the online idnits tools. > > From a recent mail exchange: > >> I do not know why the nits check tool http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ reports so many problems. While I do not understand many of them, for example: >> >> /tmp/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-04.txt(185): update_references( [RFC6606] distinguishes "power-affluent" nodes (mains-powered or) > > This instance seems to work better: > > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ > > Still, you have to ignore the barrage of "outdated state file" messages at the start, though (see below). > > I'm using the homebrew idnits (just submitted a pull request there, BTW), so I'm not directly concerned. > But can we restore online idnits to its former greatness? > > Grüße, Carsten > > > idnits 2.12.16 > > tmp/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology.txt: > - The draft- state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - No draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz state file. Attempting to download it... > - No draft-clausen-lln-rpl-experiences state file. Attempting to download it... > - No draft-hui-vasseur-roll-rpl-deployment state file. Attempting to download it... > - No draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle state file. Attempting to download it... > - No draft-ietf-lwig-terminology state file. Attempting to download it... > - No draft-ietf-roll-terminology state file. Attempting to download it... > - No draft-mariager-6lowpan-v6over-dect-ule state file. Attempting to download it... > - No rfc0793 state file. Attempting to download it... > Attempted to download rfc0793 state... > Failure fetching the file, proceeding without it. > - The rfc1024 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - The rfc172 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - The rfc1981 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - No rfc218 state file. Attempting to download it... > - No rfc250 state file. Attempting to download it... > - No rfc284 state file. Attempting to download it... > Attempted to download rfc284 state... > Failure fetching the file, proceeding without it. > - No rfc3149 state file. Attempting to download it... > - The rfc421 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - The rfc4838 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - No rfc4919 state file. Attempting to download it... > - No rfc6551 state file. Attempting to download it... > - No rfc6606 state file. Attempting to download it... > - The rfc793 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - The rfc802 state file is not from today. > Attempting to download a newer one... > - No rfc9959 state file. Attempting to download it... > Attempted to download rfc9959 state... > Failure fetching the file, proceeding without it. > > Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see > http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > No issues found here. > > Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
- [Tools-discuss] idnits tool strangeness Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits tool strangeness Bob Hinden