Re: [Tools-discuss] moving/marking rfcdiff to not get cached by cloudflare

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 02 January 2020 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E91C120047 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:52:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTPd9XNXbZcq for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9453C12003E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B24F3897B; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:52:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9061258; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:52:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <459fa2e8-5cf7-4ced-acf2-b5d612c311cc@www.fastmail.com>
References: <4782.1577823296@localhost> <459fa2e8-5cf7-4ced-acf2-b5d612c311cc@www.fastmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:52:15 -0500
Message-ID: <1755.1577937135@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/5laUHJL4XJoZpp9Z7e6wfFpT4CQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] moving/marking rfcdiff to not get cached by cloudflare
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 03:52:20 -0000

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
    > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, at 07:14, Michael Richardson wrote:
    >>
    >> I construct URLs for rfcdiff, pointing it to my formatted txt file on github,
    >> against my DT -XX.txt file. This is now being cached, I assume by
    >> cloudflare.
    >> Being able to Shift-Reload on the tab to validate the changes is really useful.
    >>
    >> I wonder if we can someone how mark the results as uncacheable?
    >> Or move rfcdiff to another name which isn't cached? or...?

    > Shift-Reload should mark the request as not drawing from cache.  But
    > the response I see doesn't have any validity information.  That might
    > mean that you might be getting heuristic caching.

...

    > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-git-using-github.txt&url2=https://ietf-gitwg.github.io/using-github/draft-ietf-git-using-github.txt

Since I'm using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ I wonder if the problem is
that the underlying file is being cached?