[Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting for approval: draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 08 July 2024 17:02 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6CCC217CC9; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6ikIPz3l0UQ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38212C217CEB; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (172-125-100-52.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [172.125.100.52]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 156301E039; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:02:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D70E0AFE-3ED3-41B9-9BCC-77E1549378B2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.8\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <44579ca7-87c3-4b02-acbb-60c5102db121@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 13:02:44 -0400
Message-Id: <EB1E0482-04D0-4486-8AAE-6A5768E41CF5@pfrc.org>
References: <172018680047.1354870.10412530143856717047@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-g8gwj> <4F84892C-21A3-46CC-986D-FDDC4E59A85C@pfrc.org> <08697702-a9ca-4454-ab21-d1bb9ce10f05@nostrum.com> <D1E83D92-95D4-4049-A0C8-9AE3385EDD37@pfrc.org> <44579ca7-87c3-4b02-acbb-60c5102db121@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.8)
Message-ID-Hash: KYZXLN7BGC6R2IBZ7QCKUGUKP34R5BDL
X-Message-ID-Hash: KYZXLN7BGC6R2IBZ7QCKUGUKP34R5BDL
X-MailFrom: jhaas@pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tools-discuss@ietf.org, idr chairs <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, Srihari Sangli <ssangli@juniper.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting for approval: draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/5nuy7eeSXTXQmPJMYsr3C_LCHQc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Robert, I moved the original draft status as you suggested before looking for the approval. However, the approval link doesn't show any controls for either Sue or I to be able to approve the new -00 as below. Any chance the tools team can take a look for the submission and move it to approved? -- Jeff > On Jul 8, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/8/24 9:30 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote: >> Robert, >> >> The "in call for adoption" as the latch state is the explanation I was looking for. Thanks. >> >> Before we approve, will any datatracker meta data be compromised by the move whiel it's in that state? > Nothing will break, but it might make for an easier to understand history (for people reading it years from now) if you change that state before you approve the replacing draft. > > RjS > >> >> >> -- Jeff >> >> >>> On Jul 8, 2024, at 10:18 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com <mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jeff - thanks for flagging this. >>> >>> There is a different draft "call for adoption" state in the idr working group. >>> >>> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric-aigp/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric-aigp/> >>> That this new submission claims to replace, hence the chairs need to approve the -00 (approving the replacement of a draft that has wg state). >>> >>> RjS >>> >>> >>> On 7/8/24 9:00 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote: >>>> It may simply be too early in my morning to see what's going on here, but why has this draft been flagged for chairs' approval? The draft is in the form of draft-NAME-WG where IDR is an active WG. >>>> >>>> -- Jeff >>>> >>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org <mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org>> >>>>> Subject: New Internet-Draft waiting for approval: draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric >>>>> Date: July 5, 2024 at 9:40:00 AM EDT >>>>> To: <idr-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>> >>>>> Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>> >>>>> Resent-To: jhaas@pfrc.org <mailto:jhaas@pfrc.org>, jie.dong@huawei.com <mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>, keyur@arrcus.com <mailto:keyur@arrcus.com>, skh@ndzh.com <mailto:skh@ndzh.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Chair approval is needed for posting of draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric-00. >>>>> >>>>> Note: This submission belongs to an inactive working group. >>>>> >>>>> To approve the Internet-Draft, go to this URL (note: you need to login to be able to approve): >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/143818/5a2131db17aea75fff3c06ac4cbebed1/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/143818/5a2131db17aea75fff3c06ac4cbebed1/> >>>>> >>>>> File name : draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric >>>>> Revision : 00 >>>>> Submission date : 2024-07-05 >>>>> Group : Individual Submission >>>>> >>>>> Title : Accumulated Metric in NHC attribute >>>>> Document date : 2024-07-05 >>>>> Pages : 22 >>>>> File size : 51.7 KB >>>>> >>>>> Submitter : Srihari Sangli <ssangli@juniper.net <mailto:ssangli@juniper.net>> >>>>> >>>>> Abstract : RFC7311 describes mechanism for carrying accumulated IGP cost across >>>>> BGP domains however it limits to IGP-metric only. There is a need to >>>>> accumulate and propagate different types of metrics as it will aid in >>>>> intent-based end-to-end path across BGP domains. This document >>>>> defines BGP extensions for Generic Metric sub-types that enable >>>>> different types of metrics to be accumulated and carried in BGP. >>>>> This is applicable when multiple domains exchange BGP routing >>>>> information. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Authors: >>>>> Srihari Sangli <ssangli@juniper.net <mailto:ssangli@juniper.net>> >>>>> Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net <mailto:shraddha@juniper.net>> >>>>> Reshma Das <dreshma@juniper.net <mailto:dreshma@juniper.net>> >>>>> Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com <mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com>> >>>>> Bin Wen <bin_wen@comcast.com <mailto:bin_wen@comcast.com>> >>>>> Marcin Kozak <marcin_kozak@comcast.com <mailto:marcin_kozak@comcast.com>> >>>>> Jie Dong <jie_dong@huawei.com <mailto:jie_dong@huawei.com>> >>>>> Luay Jalil <luay.jalil@verizon.com <mailto:luay.jalil@verizon.com>> >>>>> Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ketant.ietf@gmail.com>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> The IETF Secretariat >>>>> through the Internet-Draft submission service >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>> Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org> >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org> >>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
- [Tools-discuss] Fwd: New Internet-Draft waiting f… Jeffrey Haas
- [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting fo… Paul Hoffman
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Fwd: New Internet-Draft waiti… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting fo… Jeffrey Haas
- [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting fo… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting fo… Jeffrey Haas
- [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting fo… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting fo… Susan Hares