IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 29 July 2020 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2613D3A0BC8 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5zWbYBsiYjq for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159D33A0BB8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C9D548044; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:02:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 78104440043; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:02:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:02:49 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200729150249.GC1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CA+wi2hMsSVn44PEoPeKHyyvnZ2eaE8bmyM0vGQMNYB3rc8DoWQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F7672D9-91FE-4D0E-ADA0-69EB0C2438A9@ietf.org> <CABFReBq04ERNkhp412QAJM-tqLA0cUnjbj6FXqeXQTGaWC-yAA@mail.gmail.com> <AEA414AB-D633-4258-8BDE-7FB2F7B72651@ietf.org> <CA+wi2hOa4W+R+_DD3T7Cn90g5CL4YZ7HyTv8omVudvAzP2fZYA@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBrjbZPeqDrKZAfNw45t5qawRrCL53Xx60psongXgHQ_2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hPn200ZeToVU2CAYK=4LZkjTBRJpm9Zu1_q0xqVnOhJ7g@mail.gmail.com> <20200729144816.GB1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A61C6672-0337-4AEF-906F-3BB4C9C92806@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A61C6672-0337-4AEF-906F-3BB4C9C92806@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/6YFdD6Tj0YVvK9wO6hz2-RkqfRQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:02:57 -0000

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:56:02AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > How is it possible that in a physcial meeting we are able to utilize all possible
> > before andd after meeting times, and now going virtual where we should have
> > FEWER time constraints, we enforce MORE ?
> 
> Poor chair discipline does sometimes result in chairs trying to run their meetings into the break. This is a failure on the part of the chairs, not a feature.

Sure, but are we trying to virtualize our common experiences, requirements or
trying to create a more strict regime ?

I see far fewer reasons for strict meetecho session limits than there are fo physical rooms.

Sorry, but this makes totally no sense to me.

Cheers
    toerless

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email