Re: [Tools-discuss] .txt? [I-D Action: draft-xxx.txt]

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 27 June 2021 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEAA3A1361 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=SweZr8qu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=aJyIiujl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5Kat0sUc-Sk for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9751B3A135F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 47387 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2021 02:14:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=b917.60d7defc.k2106; bh=2D0DNY8ZRwOcyJmtctvM4oGX5YIH9eKqVjoKZZOQuQk=; b=SweZr8quCpZMeqvYXFpyP8BB0yz9tR9HvwWHbGU28Y+auSaofxBp1l8e6zZz32awsbqqHkZdYGXcEZry86aSEU01lmOoEaZyDxAyTYuqsVMEMohjnMRc42PBrHMQS/8F9BXCPsH7R1g+h81dMmXQSjv2qFOWW35AApFdRwt4yCMYB2Pmf+p0/4AjCqU88O+xOxIlyCyekeZHRNGuMbhJ/E+N4phrjzoXu7UzcBgl6wk/AwYpRx69tm4p7Fd8hHAb+Xm0E6hXo+vhXqGqamGYL1GmCVjDFvQObPFpGhxsvSC6KR4loynfK4nGE47n489+l0CSDFA2kOQcKIUUm+TA0g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=b917.60d7defc.k2106; bh=2D0DNY8ZRwOcyJmtctvM4oGX5YIH9eKqVjoKZZOQuQk=; b=aJyIiujlgg5HvevZ0YRjq7DLH9v7u60vDNZDcAqaLD2bxb8Fr7sg20s5ayMHNw0f1jK5f338bwCY0gObXUmBnQ37APs9fIMUOoCoX9rJAcpokP9DzcILagl3JwLgL++vOuyvniCRN34qaBQQWyM8BLgS0sV0GLh0DQpQD/tO2JyUdM0M3+AqCjFIF+w+X43E2SwCA1Yl74NQHCctdpBcFwL5WSYucZS8Kr6PkXfeqUHwkvgeB02dhLHSKe3NDB7EeHZU92bAcubfH8Ui/5B67qP/eBuD3GAeISSLUlXhBHaG3Dtso5NNh++UxtJ/z0tXgoZK6Z3lO5xt+rf3n0ogGw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 27 Jun 2021 02:14:20 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 612F5188986F; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:14:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E605188984A; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:14:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:14:17 -0400
Message-ID: <584d34d6-5630-bbb7-35cc-9459dabc80f0@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <691b91b6-86d7-2a3d-b9dc-8c19cc507db4@gmail.com>
References: <20210627013258.1D30F188447C@ary.qy> <691b91b6-86d7-2a3d-b9dc-8c19cc507db4@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/6Y_rAAhHY-6KJkZ9xrxmWsY17ZA>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] .txt? [I-D Action: draft-xxx.txt]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 02:14:30 -0000

> Why aren't we actively encouraging people to submit xml2rfcv3 source, and rewarding those who do so with a message that makes it clear that this is what we prefer?

Among the many things on the to-do list is to redo the I-D submission page 
to make it clearer that you only need to submit one version of a draft, 
and that we'd appreciate the XML version if you have one.

R's,
John

> On 27-Jun-21 13:32, John Levine wrote:
>> It appears that Brian E Carpenter  <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> said:
>>> Why does the subject field and the Filename say ".txt" for a v3 draft?
>>
>> Because you can still submit text I-D's if you want.  If you submit xml
>> it'll render it into text, but it can't go the other way.
>>
>> If your I-D makes it into the publication queue and there isn't an XML
>> version, the RPC will hand convert your text but that doesn't happen
>> very often now except for people who write their drafts in MS Word.
>>
>> R's,
>> John
>>
>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-01.txt
>>> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:43:05 -0700
>>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>>> Reply-To: anima@ietf.org
>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>>> CC: anima@ietf.org
>>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach WG of the IETF.
>>>
>>>        Title           : Guidelines for Autonomic Service Agents
>>>        Authors         : Brian Carpenter
>>>                          Laurent Ciavaglia
>>>                          Sheng Jiang
>>>                          Pierre Peloso
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-01.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 27
>>> 	Date            : 2021-06-26
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>   This document proposes guidelines for the design of Autonomic Service
>>>   Agents for autonomic networks.  Autonomic Service Agents, together
>>>   with the Autonomic Network Infrastructure, the Autonomic Control
>>>   Plane and the Generic Autonomic Signaling Protocol constitute base
>>>   elements of a so-called autonomic networks ecosystem.
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly