[Tools-discuss] Visualizing individual drafts becoming working group drafts

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 15 March 2017 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981F8129A99; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Go14XCwZJAog; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57E8E129A96; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2FA90nF029806; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:09:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vjnPm26F6zDHgC; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:09:00 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:08:59 +0100
Cc: core-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511265339.76806-944250cb2dbf02b2b86a3ead0aec37f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1D21BF23-6D78-4709-92C6-AEC629FB2D7A@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/7utIv301CgWFePcUzeqYXW4Dwt4>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Visualizing individual drafts becoming working group drafts
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:09:04 -0000

Compare the graphics in:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-somaraju-core-sid/

and

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/

Wouldn’t it be useful to make more explicit that the individual draft lives on as a working group draft?

(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-sid-00 does not show the previous versions either.)

Too much confusion for people trying to find out what’s going on.

Grüße, Carsten