Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7553A0BDA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRMFYkabzYS3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3553A0BD8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id q76so2226213wme.4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=DUGchuNZodHaX+KgzCBT6Cq1UlJTmo5vXDyUF+NUabU=; b=DsduoCciFSFECLdQkXk+kEPaytslzypV7xT85avhikGcJn7gD9PYO7vCcfqIcMOLXg DZ9971+Pr7NKmepbbcEQQiYnFiuLtDOpXcXNoTZhkhcHWxcItvnyIUiooGhRlZlM7LFZ qyzmbcJMFqI9HF7iFBOxi9LTp0ariLBka66cG5IRrTUjZlbFS6A6B+NKoDPPucXjAcBw M80L8gqssFbK0HV6asR4qmoooX2UEPGP44AnizIXOg1zFOCZdVPq0Do/Lz6r/j/cGZ/M CR5r8rAbYxqCieK0SawlzNHqjYDTDJxiLG2XYTy9g3EwyUuueax81nSdROEr6NnWLmWg spjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=DUGchuNZodHaX+KgzCBT6Cq1UlJTmo5vXDyUF+NUabU=; b=DVnRqCQG3w0IijaPL2BwZ9DxQjrslvLmT0DUhqbVn9gvWmFmtWMsEuZ7LlRZKU5rb/ TrQnEPayxBWO0zmt6CwhPZnww4kHD0i8JgPdlptFuCAIjGU8+/E448OC3g7o9dn4Bfa0 nHNuRHMiqQ0dkFHVyKoP+Qmaybe9x99aleyom5yzW5tp72//LVlwmooXJn47fY/R11wE q/blIhY5ukSZ+bPF1fzsleX0nGub+bPKrg+DOl3HhGRy1RfpyfTeXIgp+0I2crWNH6z2 bLr76zdJEbcHcn+anw6Ji9ZiGCxhgx19Vv0ZmdzqmZ99g0+jRSx4lowpokr5QDEO3n1d hC9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530P0GNTrHB8PFNRPEjwW5Xl+HUHTnV2Wq8q2XeT5DLzBi7sWd91 QAwBb7wJEugkr5cEk0K0y3U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoDd4nWWLdlvzcRAmSlYUgLgApP9ZaY8DjHY9c7o+YDWoqfjkwYrBIEyEgUbLzVPW/o59Dig==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:bd04:: with SMTP id n4mr9870715wmf.83.1596037449858; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:1c8e:ef20:b301:a701? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:1c8e:ef20:b301:a701]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z207sm6385444wmc.2.2020.07.29.08.44.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <573D7854-CC41-4756-84FF-050ED3F27680@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C358457E-6EA9-463A-8CCE-EC81611F2682"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:43:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: <534F20CF-E55F-4C21-9C93-95739A8D857E@cable.comcast.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
To: Jason Livingood <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
References: <534F20CF-E55F-4C21-9C93-95739A8D857E@cable.comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/8S3QUXYCRRwXEaXEZWS5Vs16Q5E>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:44:13 -0000

Jason,

> On Jul 29, 2020, at 8:32 AM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
> Fair enough, Ted. I guess they key point is it’d be nice to be able to join more than 10 mins ahead of time to test A/V and do other prep – especially for the WG chairs & presenters. And secondarily to let sessions run a bit past the precise time the session ends, because we’ve all been in sessions that end up running a bit over. What the exact time before/after is matters less to me that it is possible. And I think the time in advance for A/V testing is more important of the two suggestions.

I think this is about right.   Opening up the room 15 minutes early should allow for the chairs and speakers to test their audio, and 5 minutes after allows for a small amount of session overflow.

Bob


> 
> Jason
> 
> From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 11:28 AM
> To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
> Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
> 
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 11:24 AM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
>> - Allow users to enter a meeting session 60 mins beforehand and for the session to run for 120 mins afterwards before the session terminates. (Seems logical that they must terminate to free up server resources - but enable some normal meeting time run over as well as post-meeting banter/wrap up.)
> 
> Please no. This would be a real abuse of the IETF process. A 120 minute meeting afterwards would be a side meeting, not the WG meeting. It should be handled explicitly as a side meeting.
> 
> If we want WGs to have more time, this isn’t the way to do it.
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org