IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Strange IDnits behavior (or is it something else?)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 22 September 2020 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FEC3A1548 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 01:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hME__RPgazCX for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 01:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286D23A09C9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 01:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1600763366; bh=o/utG+HQ3w4VOwJiUqQziDY1VXK8qtQxR01a2IiulLA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=i6V3QQ6Utq1iqT922bWhEwtcF9OKPVSj7cLVrzCc+Ni5ukRRreQ0JoSO0Tk8PdlaT nkRHNDH02dITa9foAdN7vV0jInpyHrEWOtKZz6HTYTSGIaAzisInBNkf6DoH9qc+oj 6cjLnRuw0SWMfL1VZ0ed+WBjjtbcBdxtvfbjxupk=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.51.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQ5vc-1k7UVq30E4-00M5pK for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:29:26 +0200
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <CAKKJt-eeYvfOuFwqTtXeHrYjnw3hQR_u8hb4sc9c1zSi5oXK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <3f032b28-3159-355e-db2c-8be749fad47e@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:29:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eeYvfOuFwqTtXeHrYjnw3hQR_u8hb4sc9c1zSi5oXK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9aWo5dEx56gsB/D3kAruVTaSGJbkGzpWK6Kg60C31tO9PGGPmE7 DTDmS+NQyReanb60VF0K0CveIqyx3taGxLSkK0JUu5wBkyi9Sck6jhkj6vSV5Pfba3lbKco XH5V05OpQDcn1PfWW5cPpdaR6jDCq9Hh5uK0es1+tfx6ux8EOMTzsOMDqCj8Q4EHrMqKj4C wmybjFWEC/1SVcSGvyYiQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:yFvmjfhJxas=:111lNz7xC+qdC1u3oqc11C 18KY+oy0MKd9Tw4efDeYeQXfI0kDBhLb8x//c8skAlrq5sfhtpST3l5pMBEo21p3Ms5I7yWJa 81FKUFeGZNJ+aRYj2I7KOra3hBKSjKxunnTqCHXEzuWJl6zKNg/gRH4PaeOhz8Jm3Z5vVLyVc cUrnPhWGOPVa4E546OQLnkBe6WusXwlVgWJBeRs8fnAe7vTjSAf6R4kPTv1rchcTqTMjjeLuD CDdi6+epVQ9BeRjVjB3KiHfme3dvIANsUH5upKsAya4VbKjMNQBLbWWRVg5za+ghLEGAy9K7v HVrchytNagF559QJaWhpepQCkoadYuSBLmCxnzVkaMC0aQoPnhPtvwjDwsTErNuIbFf41f4LU axl8ZvAFHtf355Ev/Q4LQ43z8NxUjTI56zqpuzEoZQg3rV502l/H9rN13GWshZy44FX4VLeba A1nyG2ayE9vWeSryOMm/LnKV6vFbRJePF1q+aRa5MSqzPSuDJdqq4OETSZKVwaCd5l0/v+DOF M0pxcTpaq+Pjt/5HqPhAY0pwtPod39QRWJmf50ialygpSST3nl2NOLLWeaBW4Q5wkMwGLz0wm ymItt/E/+oZpjjoWGkQqoxgHKeWMnkdkfx8J3E0QYZ7VBmZRJLAcwA4OniMe8C8bKJwpIOHMI ehEoainMFzJ1uhtkCIN1e7zjYj4lpYJNKV7EkBcGthfcWX3pk/ARFIRhu542DPlTfCT6VOXXD ZJ+n6qDsRVJRrkfIR0um+/Von1osibrrxdake3y+hpdHqxskjy7fq1zIYraqLB7ivdl9ERpJL 7wQLyF8CpbbQVin5P+lqYCyZmNQFIdAWRqR/KN3q37vQ3CgMA9BSURT5iVyGc2PUtls7f7g93 NDTNDmU7h4SN1am/JLBDAp3vVl4e4LSyhXOozSDItGp2XcichymZn8I0r/s8qw4bM0hvT9TPX GQP8efOCZiBhDzaH0spbnxm9n45rBOOjPQJB6aAz6M22CBKCahcavThUp3OL+J8cOX9J75j9p sNylDDMF+JZP54UX99MCoPBBSQIeiWuJghY1cwUm6zY+b6hWaQTvGfxn/vISKdKM59WLKf5YF xy5CPGDJdk7a3igq104x31EPCEUMY60sehVoNAKJrfarv9Ze08jqPprvGZyfHePCR5j5hIuOV aJbvZIPk+CdLwinrFunsseWbLKcChmUDQ8qIbdrNQO4J0mRB4e8Sl+VeFsIAPI2kSMq9vwlFZ egkMrZnJdpCSs1LYildRkY7my40CYq2fNBKxx+w==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/92pcwl1BeYJvQotHmsJiY9bkA5U>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Strange IDnits behavior (or is it something else?)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 08:29:33 -0000

Am 30.07.2020 um 04:44 schrieb Spencer Dawkins at IETF:
> I'm working on a draft and getting some weird behavior when running
> IDnits and trying to submit the draft.
>
> In IDnits, I'm getting
>
>    -- The document date (January 2021) is 170 days in the future.  Is this
>       intentional?

...maybe caused by xml2rfc v3's change in date format in the boilerplate?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email