Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful

[Meetecho IETF support <[e-mail]>]

The BIER meeting has been closed 15 minutes after the scheduled end 
time. You can clearly see that from the Jabber logs:

	https://www.ietf.org/jabber/logs/bier/2020-07-29.html

See my message at 12:55:45.

Alessandro

Il 29/07/20 17:18, Greg Mirsky ha scritto:
> Hi Jay,
> it could be. I was not taking notes at the moment.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:13 AM Jay Daley <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>     On 30/07/2020, at 3:09 AM, Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>>     On the first day of IETF-108 Meetcho closed the SPRING WG meeting
>>     on the clock. It was announced that five minutes grace period will
>>     be added. BIER meeting, to the best of my knowledge, was closed
>>     not at +5 but -5 minutes. Unannounced change of policy?
> 
>     Greg - are you sure it wasn’t five minutes before the top of the
>     hour, which is five minutes after the meeting is scheduled to finish?
> 
>     Jay
> 
> 
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Greg
>>
>>     On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:03 AM Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>>         On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:56:02AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>         > On Jul 29, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>         > > How is it possible that in a physcial meeting we are able
>>         to utilize all possible
>>         > > before andd after meeting times, and now going virtual
>>         where we should have
>>         > > FEWER time constraints, we enforce MORE ?
>>         >
>>         > Poor chair discipline does sometimes result in chairs trying
>>         to run their meetings into the break. This is a failure on the
>>         part of the chairs, not a feature.
>>
>>         Sure, but are we trying to virtualize our common experiences,
>>         requirements or
>>         trying to create a more strict regime ?
>>
>>         I see far fewer reasons for strict meetecho session limits
>>         than there are fo physical rooms.
>>
>>         Sorry, but this makes totally no sense to me.
>>
>>         Cheers
>>             toerless
>>
>>         ___________________________________________________________
>>         Tools-discuss mailing list
>>         [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>>
>>         Please report datatracker.ietf.org
>>         <http://datatracker.ietf.org/> and mailarchive.ietf.org
>>         <http://mailarchive..ietf.org/>
>>         bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
>>         or send email to [e-mail]
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>
>>         Please report tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org/> bugs at
>>         http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
>>         or send email to [e-mail]
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>
>>     ___________________________________________________________
>>     Tools-discuss mailing list
>>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>>
>>     Please report datatracker.ietf.org <http://datatracker.ietf.org>
>>     and mailarchive.ietf.org <http://mailarchive.ietf.org>
>>     bugs at http://tools..ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
>>     <http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb>
>>     or send email to [e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>
>>     Please report tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org> bugs at
>>     http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
>>     or send email to webmaster@tools..ietf.org
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
> 
>     -- 
>     Jay Daley
>     IETF Executive Director
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to [e-mail]
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to [e-mail]
>