Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug
Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> Wed, 28 August 2019 21:26 UTC
Return-Path: <jyasskin@google.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3572120059 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmJD83mU3fNz for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03CC112011B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id h27so766724lfp.2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MmMxrDHrke1GptGfgvGa0LMC/oCwp/QKYkJB2p9cN+g=; b=mrI/pskk7bZ3A7Ht7q5uc5m+Fdv9DKoVt85T6dEmPBa/fxgYahV48aN8SCB4Fwwnd8 xjUpj19CKv3San+z/MSrBe7nyVdvw82a6BKSpejxjCKipACB+UyFnLv1ZUtdJiN0AGJa JIDjN35jjV0jv7XM59w2UHH34qAG5eLS+R/EGhfH4JLUYiR7Br1lp9rnn4x7uf3IQMc8 TDZgPMgpRUJfOHw5HbHEODe+xuE5X7Ok9GaReZpJ8wTYLeXbX/dKHn5Y4f4oYwLXFrf+ dgkxLQmWlvBkXj2sZHxb2qUopav0yyzRa9C7I2+B+Tj2n/ccEXp8wSDoG/ilGsBYIRSo 4uUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MmMxrDHrke1GptGfgvGa0LMC/oCwp/QKYkJB2p9cN+g=; b=oQSLrMJH4KR35avw8EKNPH/eG20Kt93FzsYuJkl+QZ7WnuSKcLou1iWRpIVrdgDfS1 JOhvTDDANssYFO3/BJT+Ts6KLG4VBJwbfM+/JLeRNUHc70LKZ791HGooWn8p/uUxfpIC hfhQQPDS5JBF4Za57zVyTEJpR8bi7hV+6ZeDjtGEfaD6Rgm63f0cftX0Xsoh8KD5bcKu UQarK2nSFDMKwbHST39Gv6WgRX2QJK0vRAs2Bjr+ywe4Ev9wdwx1UrMtSWKh5VmDmjFB IQk/DIpBGvpdp8TTXSIhEL3Sr+ubkQjhSeQbhri7jWFpkByq1JRem9Klb0e3NFYK6tWf O48A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9E9SnoNMzP9eQOW8bkagup0ZbuVFOIwouFpAUMtkKQ5mdYkfM qNVHNmkRfF+Kt9VDkBOvd2tuECNCXse3YQRB7ceB4g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRGEPLzpZ1rdzNWbL+wPZ8tK2dpGo60KT1HD6spsOpz5dvD2J/gVmt2DoOX2L/yaNDRkYoX2VZ6YgjWnq+d1g=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4b0d:: with SMTP id y13mr3934497lfa.128.1567027567861; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANh-dXmkoGgRBHXXcE+Ha1nkWcmKNMXW=WDnwHB4RWmM+QXsUg@mail.gmail.com> <432c82bc-d63b-43a0-96e8-f36e5d9d1be8@levkowetz.com> <CAHw9_i+xq4Wni2nmVoywDC5zirRaYaUfF+C=_nMWiS5p50YzsA@mail.gmail.com> <e63d4330-f6c8-6312-55c7-ca322d50207d@gmx.de> <CANh-dXnOnvC8RfQJ2wX1WSobtXghkLnjgRMOwVmxg1MRTnMVXw@mail.gmail.com> <edb30b51-e64b-f314-bfe9-e22801eba17e@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <edb30b51-e64b-f314-bfe9-e22801eba17e@levkowetz.com>
From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:25:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CANh-dXm5FH_Z+G4K5+NSrGuN9=EtHguciLfyvhsSLmbhBP3Z3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/A2-iGMZCF7TD91jcgTwQ5z9sAWk>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:26:13 -0000
Thanks for looking into it! Jeffrey On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:23 PM Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote: > > Hi Jeffrey, > > On 2019-08-28 23:16, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > > Thanks for pointing out that this changes across browsers and > > versions. I've filed > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=998893 so Chrome > > folks can look into it and undo the change if it's incorrect. > > Ack, thanks! > > > Is the line-height:0 really needed in the RFC style? It doesn't seem > > like you intend 0-height lines here. > > I'm not sure -- it's probably 15 years since I put together the CSS for > the htmlized documents, and the only thing I've tweaked since is the > horizontal placement (left vs. center) of the document text in the viewport. > > I'll go and have a look, but I suspect I had a reason at the time. There > could very well be much better CSS solutions today, though. > > > Best regards, > > Henrik > > > > Jeffrey > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:57 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> > >> On 27.08.2019 16:29, Warren Kumari wrote: > >> > Broken for me -- image: http://www.owl-stretching-time.com/css.png > >> > > >> > Running: > >> > Google Chrome77.0.3865.42 (Official Build) beta (64-bit) > >> > Revision560add2406a0e2970a0c7983e3a3fb36bcdc7d5c-refs/branch-heads/3865@{#523} > >> > OSmacOS Version 10.14.6 (Build 18G87) > >> > JavaScriptV8 7.7.299.4 > >> > > >> > W > >> > ... > >> > >> I can confirm that Chrome 77 (beta) shows the breakage, while 76 does > >> not. I'll leave it to CSS experts to decide, who's bug this is... > >> > >> Best regards, Julian > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Tools-discuss mailing list > > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > > > Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org > > bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org > > > > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at > > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues > > or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org > > >
- [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS bug Jeffrey Yasskin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Jeffrey Yasskin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcmarkup-1.129 feedback: CSS… Jeffrey Yasskin