[Tools-discuss] Re: A message not from a list member

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Thu, 28 August 2025 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932F95A45B35 for <tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRBRnHbva18t for <tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804E05A45B30 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-76e4fc419a9so1538744b3a.0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1756415200; x=1757020000; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lYHUCQGgWyr4BI9PDUdO9n7JSdXfDvfs21iS+dMDasQ=; b=rnCgrxn/81HYHjyGBfDGQz34wULg9Rb15pLxOeDpGQ3w2nLmTHCmrcK1hzGRyasgOi gDiA7yX/jJ9/tyiznzt5gNAOl7joHbTuQtpq0e3/bonWQTQK9g7jsNzx1dxnvpgc9GzD zmU++u0cc5NFxa1wd2ggXbeKhZHu382oWU6+kyMwphVX/qLoInetHPFopkhKCyoC+d3m lydF/4v0+kLQ1v48WzcsZh3w8niYNE1gjjR7wMhNEpsPy6LLt3d/Y+iq8K7gY7JfF0mS R2NJadA5/gGRw2ZPTun0lJAlUUcuDIJUxDz2ktiZ3KlFz+eP2S59EcfPAxUjrla6PVam Bv5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756415200; x=1757020000; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lYHUCQGgWyr4BI9PDUdO9n7JSdXfDvfs21iS+dMDasQ=; b=ZvoKG1SXo+iEbpUyQfkGm3qJ8AyDtngF7bHJLdA1t3z+Xearlv5Oh2RdcKVUZfaCOf LeMATsUnT0JS8A7p+msBhGVUJ+yHPq+YsLWGITqhlGQVHDoNGq3LZO3qy6Gxm8vk/M+X wfTQTI9HhxAaVPYH8ZuRO4L1qL+RVrmUH+nb5rv3KHZjdBn31xwESPzM5dJ3Q6CvF6nt ahpWmz1LoX8LSHI/MLM/+OCJhqDfa0iDiIN/hAzxXY9FdZE0d66eWqjBqZy56CnSf4T2 24ND+nUq2GXYM3zaR6p3rqGANDvxlyS/dWtyUiMT4xS8d4315hsArfO4WNni1Xjy7ecD Prtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyaCEEDr9tUeCDtaHuBIUnopebyQerkqKREjSx0wma2Q+AOM6SP nke9LaidJdiwJ6lPXvKj08VgF1c6b0zHVkqPH1pwxFFobRD086ET79XEqOy/rEbl8vNqmQ==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuQ3aS7sma2r0q3x5FHjrS6dYIw8jmux1YHx9SwY1EIe5rZ4AperMBOddR2cOJ FxJNyMGLQmg6s0xMG7dBDd2tDP9YdUEKw3wu2GQDiYOsgOVrAQ1o+tyGWssjKgTpEK14PsL9JbV tbzoLofgNXJOc31KRYp6uwbn3LS7MRpx3FJUAQCvT3F8DT4uNhqN08PchBxSQ8WxxhAwBbYyzE3 lBgXl7uOqS+Qyr/+PjPE21Iab7+QvCAYgTovfLlhArzxSq0n93aah2xgeqcET7Ym4UeQPAHSyB9 1FZMiGwxgwtiLAFdcpF4M5e3q6nImx/sdbA7EaRqQ3DS8b6DJHczsEYjWpmCShAEyA21nO6Gj7h ZA4G5Y6T48vaDBhu9p8QDWBSmaMHcAMN7JSbW8PcND0+Rpr2lnDZoiGtComF8wNyIcQSKM515Xo zSwqdam9hTq2qqChIXgpssKs73rBVAfw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF5ll8NLRLRGbs2aLSTBiv947bwgWonP9UQTu3PleZCfU11DyylNRDj/bt2kMIMmF58SqeLPA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1896:b0:771:e7e0:5fa1 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-771e7e065demr18375224b3a.26.1756415200530; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (203-96-136-230.dsl-dynamic.connections.net.nz. [203.96.136.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-7722a2af911sm371890b3a.23.2025.08.28.14.06.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <cae671d5-2cfc-4a28-9042-0ba5bedd838f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:06:24 +1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5D7F2FA9-194D-4BD9-8EC9-B78CF7DA94B7@ietf.org>
References: <CADNypP-SuHuyUmunfp1eZxLrkHHgSSkiuQcU2o64_u7QtVA5EQ@mail.gmail.com> <e1ed061b-9956-43c9-b8c9-2a9f677efbdf@nostrum.com> <cae671d5-2cfc-4a28-9042-0ba5bedd838f@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
Message-ID-Hash: WLVNUXCFS75COW44IKR277W6O43LPWYP
X-Message-ID-Hash: WLVNUXCFS75COW44IKR277W6O43LPWYP
X-MailFrom: jay@staff.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: A message not from a list member
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/A7b3OuTgv2jp9lec05a4ymUCSSo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

> On 29 Aug 2025, at 08:34, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree that was a very useful explanation.
> 
> I would like to underline that allowing @global-whitelist.ietf.org or @global-allowlist.ietf.org on all open discussion lists (WG lists or others) is essential as a matter of principle - we've always wanted every IETFer to be able to join any discussion.
> (Subject of course to moderation of disruptive postings, but there's a WG for that topic.)

The @global-whitelist inclusion is required in order to comply with the IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Lists [1], which states:

"IETF mailing lists MUST provide a mechanism for legitimate technical participants to bypass moderation, challenge-response, or other techniques that would interfere with a prompt technical debate on the mailing list without requiring such participants to receive list traffic. "

Jay

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org