[Tools-discuss] Re: Did AWS outage affect datatracker?
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 21 October 2025 01:07 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A427924416 for <tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYt1kcps8ctH for <tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 532FA7924411 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-33bafd5d2adso4448139a91.3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761008873; x=1761613673; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=y/9YjcUu77pgB8Ec3utD1EwZpctIRxEGEExRlnw3Q9M=; b=DdZiLdD56D7XJp6KHCefYbn0pALR1AuhOqZBv6Z0mq6+H2NAtdhtXa8KBiDrku2CIV lVNRPvtPMAPAYLiIWNk1CdrSA1TnYA6SQMEk0CteMOHy/6ApasIa+CCdobpTDAbLKvFa zlCJWtsAmnQ5W78bYDqWrdZpzJEJ1a7NwyRQgovzFzh02xfxk5iA1kU6ythqu8lp05sj fbtxuiX2DplhIV6T5ot1qylCGsLbadoIbzhOFFkfacnod/yOoopRE4pcKK+5fcVphiqE mBofH1+hp6a5P77a/pTykI4FT1K1ztRMm2JVIaCSy9FBzAPKCiJm6tXEjxIJ6nLJdKVF 6KPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761008873; x=1761613673; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=y/9YjcUu77pgB8Ec3utD1EwZpctIRxEGEExRlnw3Q9M=; b=fMEFDEyDd9qMEergvnMQaUe6bkgtM714RCLy43oT7EIckkXexWvQFWkshYUpbjcZMP GpSXAr++ierzqJoRBU+xawFrrBqgUislYqQfsOxKTuDlAYoj9Z6F0za5ZIGQgdB+3MCO yy0DopB+vogsPF/GI4Xqv3xoeJ6KZel2ZyJGgrVdvD/F2IQGivN8zYp1KOKuHKTCoSO8 HvR7z/YRPcleZ9RZlSkCNixLVVboALGzbrLfCY0mf/xURDAf10vYFD06EVaaXX20gWkM xELUFXfeb3+7e6sqaiL9SKHQ37n02zsXsyO0NAVKPdSHgzzHwuAftXyKSRVfdkHBL8cg 91fg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXo2s1odw4vjDcRriksUhL2lrnhmjJyR5sO2o0L2qPQfOQooNFqwYHvqYQGjP7A8iix+QiTJk9BKdej2/8e@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzW3EgPuVy1ORm0vIb+VhtAXnXddItoZCtPFeoX4fV2wIC98b4O Sfe1hk3Dm7GhfgZHYFDaCXVKijwuqFA6l7JPPeDcMWGAZKJMfCeSQ/V7ISrFWw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsIonH9kOcIhRD93E31IbumcaUWnZFZdc7QgXRCiODYi++3WW4jAdhUohIKyr4 TrU+Gz3FJqJJNuS8enQ1ufX32MVBuCss2OZMeelPotngSaZ9wXemvFmmEWvR+8jI9GH78CciAia HPZh2k8q3TvNjjbfeSM0wIJ3G2PU9WKxm5Mk2iLNL0XrcmS75SG8+4tdpge64fRTuqipQsspAjN ft779Avr7v5mSAhoFtQt6MYuMmP7Kb5QY5tlV597dbdp0FiLxtUQwbKBodbQl6fJ+a0PyYVgHRa TbTxyALKd2fA7L8vR1EmY7L86oOwMxByqNtvccB8xAYgpx3m7+3SV9tXCO3VASl13AX/4RuSRSx aRkYd3VQCiZm4JoIwH9q+lvcdvzfGpAagFv9fGL8A6d8/SzzHxNusWB2i1nmMIL2q8qu1NYz3D6 I/0UpspI5mLvFE+S+wjcaF8GCy8UOn0VbrfLlcOidRyAokF8aJk7nQ8fUjYZ3K/UqXuOgx3BQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHBMe4Wh/dYii9W9d78cZp5qU/LD7U2HGvxkETBe8jrkiuIV/iReR9gbEzfHNwZOvaJcH7bXA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ec8b:b0:327:ba77:a47 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-33bcf87b356mr16699366a91.15.1761008873105; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.86.238] (199-83-223-237.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net. [199.83.223.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-33d5df9258csm9419865a91.19.2025.10.20.18.07.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <16651faa-16e0-48b8-93b3-c51b84344539@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:07:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <6563C978-BF76-43A1-8B94-F098FF5124D5@bluepopcorn.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6563C978-BF76-43A1-8B94-F098FF5124D5@bluepopcorn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: UI74WHQV3DQVDXUF3KRND5KSBVI2KY4G
X-Message-ID-Hash: UI74WHQV3DQVDXUF3KRND5KSBVI2KY4G
X-MailFrom: sayrer@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Did AWS outage affect datatracker?
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/A_KD1B1Djb-9TXS0p64Z7NhNFPQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
On 10/20/25 6:03 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > Particularly since this is the internet draft cutoff day before IETF 124, I’m wondering if the AWS outage affected datatracker, and specifically the ability to upload new drafts. > > I’m aware of one instance where a participant had difficulty submitting a draft that we were expecting for Dispatch (it said that the status is “awaiting manual post”, and I don’t know what triggers that). I submitted one about 45 minutes before the cutoff, and it was fine. But I ran idnits. I didn't even fix every warning, but I got it to zero errors. thanks, Rob