Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: One more MeetEcho Feature Request

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Fri, 30 July 2021 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236BB3A1714 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crMvZsFUKYD1 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5843A16EF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cpe-65-184-148-2.ec.res.rr.com [65.184.148.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79D852A7C6; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1627688150; bh=nG4eqLi9h7swwwU8t3tDh3zwGZz56S/WLaVxMbVWung=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=JmlBHH4Bua6AGXqIj6k3pkhdQvki5bGDTuQPh5Om3ZtVPNO9YUWrJNJch0KDsjxDi cWfM8yapkEfXJegi7E/XgX1xPOn+rrTlfYQ1Jvqpx4oSgCwUEv6tIXu4Ez4ohJ44Vd DvzC43Y6PVN4Ze86ifXhBCa/VbkfksjSt4bksrV+tT3my+QVHGRj+GGWdOy588RyMx i2ZR8yUt12Ae/XZMrIvN5Af52HKp0oDjsOf9m4rQH8tX3NmVl3EpYevp7zgnSHS6Vh 8yFMqGsLA5ezr20ZAYg0SK61ZD1s8dVcnC1wS1IbCYS1wfyk4pAm6bQQPK94C38iip p5PYc9aLeGSfQ==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-76BBF5C9-CB13-4B11-8D8D-FAA8E9FFDBDF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:35:48 -0400
Message-Id: <9B00341E-0899-4FFD-9095-0434A4405790@bangj.com>
References: <D924BD35-F6AE-47FB-88FC-7D27E5F76631@gmail.com>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <D924BD35-F6AE-47FB-88FC-7D27E5F76631@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18F72)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Ayhwjc_6ESTmwoNoYhcaZ3xzMTo>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: One more MeetEcho Feature Request
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 23:36:01 -0000

> On Jul 30, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
>> Subject: One more MeetEcho Feature Request
>> Date: July 30, 2021 at 2:56:56 PM PDT
>> To: support@ietf.org
>> 
>> Put company affliation with participant name on the participant list panel. That would be really useful.
>> 
>> MeetEcho is providing more information than we would normally have with face-to-face meetings. So I see it as a huge advantage. Many make arguments that there is no substitute for face-to-face, where I agree, there are things that virutal tools provide which are valuable too. I mean, who reads the blue sheets.  ;-)
>> 
>> Thanks for consideration,
>> Dino

I would like to see affiliation more prominent as well. I would go a step further and have people list who is paying for their attendance. This is important sometimes for contractors, students, etc.

Thanks,
Tom