Re: [Tools-discuss] Replacement status set during I-D submission

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD3112029F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=b2jjHi4l; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=Z7h90n3G
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzjhHAzJa1pu for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299D61202A0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.224.146.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x31Fo4OG014572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1554133815; x=1554220215; bh=9tE1xYafo2xyCYEGQ2TXeHNuYAQ526WCz1z0nDi9N3U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=b2jjHi4lD3q7bFLo+MoWenXtBucgi+oiSE4jOxdqaIcaiALODc+QrBouHFJxUJoJO 7Mz1WgxwG347wVssTdmz+X84mhmGIWAZlsDgilBBSKtd5dIZ1FjJWfT/lyPr5/mVcE FJaayhPREIzE25aw3HiQVu8tm2jOc63rZcfP3czk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1554133815; x=1554220215; i=@elandsys.com; bh=9tE1xYafo2xyCYEGQ2TXeHNuYAQ526WCz1z0nDi9N3U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Z7h90n3GyDIpOy1iKWpdUFbS6qBoU00s8fO1f+50bBFTJ/YuUeJLZuscHNv4BxvYN GlsCOK5gSO+mXH2eGT5ulyDZeAj1dExhdZK6YGiDj8tpq4ckyQ46PyvF3nzSjxJmiC AmKpB6lEQ67OpckCUHohvR2afcgYoapfwbenar3w=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190401084312.0d1bbe18@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 08:49:48 -0700
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <e1e8d37e-8f64-4744-8324-8965c1baa8eb@nostrum.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190331092923.0c953848@elandnews.com> <FED40295-9754-4B97-B6EF-D4704329185B@vigilsec.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190331100437.0ba594b0@elandnews.com> <e1e8d37e-8f64-4744-8324-8965c1baa8eb@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/CemL5nrpy-l50z-jeui4FEsUoGU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Replacement status set during I-D submission
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:50:38 -0000

Hi Robert,
At 08:37 AM 01-04-2019, Robert Sparks wrote:
>I suspect the problem you ran into was pasting 
>"draft-klensin-recal-rev-00" into the replaces field in the 
>submission form (which will not work). Others have run into that,

Yes.

>  and there is an outstanding ticket to improve the way the form 
> behaves. See <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/1375>

Thanks for the URL.

>What would have worked was "draft-klensin-recal-rev".
>
>The most recent codesprint added more documentation to the field to 
>help others avoid that problem.

Ok.

>I think the control still could use more work to make it less likely 
>that others run afoul of this.
>
>For this draft, you can send a note to the secretariat asking them 
>to add the replaces relationship.

I'll do that.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy