[Tools-discuss] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Fwd: Brief outage for the RPC infrastructure tomorrow (15May)

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 16 May 2024 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140BFC14F71D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQLs1HUAJ-hT for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E16C14F6F5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-61bec6bab2bso96475667b3.1 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715896591; x=1716501391; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ei425gapwEZR1fNYMOg7BgnWkvCXnWnvc/NHpVyGDCM=; b=bSmROruD/H8zmlJujKyhgn08rxGhZDvVsaE79Xmzv3Lz51qV4+LniimNnCQgiUl1pg VLiVlLIJYEjKUqe+zbPRp32yP/TqLJdFS612fu+aLzBUUTvBxN19s9KPqMmSc10tcDp7 tle+HcX6E2z882Mg6T9RATC8Lq6rp5QGJ2uyp4O5x9v54IqMrKRNR+NZy0vovgggOxDs 7G2IHDdh+iCpswvl2dVYCzvgB4JJNDFq56DZ45DoNWzgdcCCNzVVD5FHe3JDVNOxUhUQ tiy2W3PQd2nAn1j0QTDGcwUKjeFSMLzPE+ph1UwlF9PbIeZfKhvUSyJxiaDjthcv9z1S bH5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715896591; x=1716501391; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ei425gapwEZR1fNYMOg7BgnWkvCXnWnvc/NHpVyGDCM=; b=BpyFV1L2SMHE5lDB1bnMmUfpNNugVQNrk/ZfbkeDL3EkWfPknimdU59GWnguIBVzkK 7PNocH6aR2SkGZRVd41nhHOMWPvFGaF4LGYMwxppdlW8qtX5Quoap+7Wkreecm9kNrSB H5/uKTT1EWzpur6KEV2AxSSVfYPhi8JocFIskgcOPmtI+ilKrP/OdS4I0ijoezL+Vsi/ xDvd8Piel4uID4u7L0ecMduee3XkF6TozXCazNAqvcQHXv8Pdy8nn1MPyrfguAJlJy3I aVIIHz6+WLigG0oavd6wNXRzWno/ng/Yxua5QRsBOuFyyG/lJ0XAXcvmM85UdgAJfzge wQjg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV/zMDQkSTEmTWXCSNrqehGWnaZutDDz6dSuJJ8H+A0C/lGXkSoMINzS5jjEHLfA8bbtwwY4oSj39/e4t4fc6h1mWBZ6J9x
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZzsxjMhS6UFRDZvUFSj4BnL4kbsH95dzpDCSXay6U7rucMBKV eMDZHda9BrLpeMZS4N8OHRf483AxTv9/EWLDvOMB0YkfFqM9IWUK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEye/zJmkXTPsqol4Id0IzHaBy+kO9qn+wba/gbZFyttervv2ec0CA3ZYTOCLKr2KiolcanPg==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:80c4:0:b0:622:c901:950b with SMTP id 00721157ae682-622c901961fmr160625187b3.43.1715896591431; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-31-208-116.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.31.208.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-6209e2347easm36082847b3.2.2024.05.16.14.56.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ACDF645-F5FD-46D7-8BC9-CC4299662351@comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 14:56:09 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8427EA1E-B153-4B25-B244-58E67CC63111@gmail.com>
References: <8dac60d8-6845-47aa-83c5-c113c30b6000@nostrum.com> <7f20db7c-fbd6-4b94-a7fd-07805b0d69e0@nostrum.com> <CF619D24477ABD0762BAC91D@PSB> <debba2c7-7fd5-467c-9734-0c0dca34ed42@nostrum.com> <A3865504-5F56-41DB-84A4-677A79101A50@comcast.com> <cd5573ae-4aff-46f3-b51f-5b466b372393@nostrum.com> <0ACDF645-F5FD-46D7-8BC9-CC4299662351@comcast.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <jason_livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: CGUTRQD2POSRDXDYVAJWT7BOFPCE7T6V
X-Message-ID-Hash: CGUTRQD2POSRDXDYVAJWT7BOFPCE7T6V
X-MailFrom: bob.hinden@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Jay Daley <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Fwd: Brief outage for the RPC infrastructure tomorrow (15May)
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Cer-2OPp01XTjqp3Vts3g14thfE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

Jason,

> On May 16, 2024, at 10:24 AM, Livingood, Jason <jason_livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>>> I thought the IETF stopped supporting FTP interfaces to IETF content a few years ago?
>> The IETF did, yes - see RFC 9141.
>> The RFC Editor has not made a similar change.
> 
> No time like the present to align the RFCE site then! ;-)

I don’t have a strong opinion one way or another.   I am  curious how much FTP is being used to access documents on the RFC-Editor site.

Seems like if it is close to zero, we can turn it off, if more significant, then people are using it and it should  continue to be supported.

Bob