Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 19 November 2020 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75CF3A0B21 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:09:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=h4Rxjp80; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QqVRxbPA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXUMbTDOTxwx for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:09:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FDB23A0B17 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:09:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C0D5C01BB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:09:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:09:43 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=xSO9bK7e2AO9d/tpUBV9TcyU/IJk0yq Fmvp36EkmIIM=; b=h4Rxjp80FV8eTL4EZKvPwt2Sz1xbaELfxzxVCQREKr5pZgw jKTyC+nHRYKEkUrZbGxTlyp4s7k8OBGJLHYet490m24hdqo4oKvqmT3rIEEXrOIX tgEKnb5NFEcs/F5wQgk/1bc1WjwFLUFHESJ/yyOfIT/dTDtNjiBEa/ehYKhWkQS/ G3ZkvzxSfkFI4X/QdMUCo8Mei4cOgQrRW4HgJYd9nudC3OjO46VRRFxS1bxKPRPf ET1BTM0iA/HL1U0ozYPaIJuBMac49dsHJ4pH/H89ykGG9DZk6CYCpQhUsRQb7y/p Ge/c9Eer8G+UdxiqtXfKEoJbdl4eZDp3iu6W7cQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=xSO9bK 7e2AO9d/tpUBV9TcyU/IJk0yqFmvp36EkmIIM=; b=QqVRxbPA9olpKBEZcSTCq3 gQ1f9W0FrwYF4jRt2FfyKLXVvI9lXdPwh6dZD2UQTMdy6GXUXXIIHLozSrSdzFoE RnwEqBG8WznXANT5cfcvxcn89p0IUp8OEYlyrHyWN1XRH74YqF8tqB3X8GyPoShK s++RblXmwgmAhFaF/OWneLytfc4Jcb/I77UvYXbTGZ9R6W657JBWTWrDO5ndK9w/ 6D0kZrM13x4pL0RxUvlLSGqRy2p6tlfzlXmpzOogGHVXMfT9UlUNyFs4u0/iFGPO e7cRaruK+AK8OkVjozK0XXSww5frZH4s07OMoTS+Z2KQdkl6uzXKAjN8ZGvhEuag ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:9uG1XzO53ZqNfIMyQxETbvCXB5su-VXEW3s-i51eovW1kU6X9UnbPw> <xme:9uG1X9_IxWEVfVKsf5JNnlrA927zoW9A7esqC_tbfDYcqohay6agWBA8X5rj16zLb jDS3fvfttMyAkeiF30>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudefiedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehfeetudduudehtdekhf dvhfetleffudejgeejffehffevkeduiefgueevkeefleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvg ht
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9uG1XyQ5o9rWo1S9-I-6_8Ti492SDNbEozyL6r_uGuhTeKgUAR96Nw> <xmx:9uG1X3sY6eY5M_gYbcJDhu06onaCf2T5-r3lwmiLh_R6pUt8RPoFOQ> <xmx:9uG1X7ey5TTkbolRQVAiv7iD0mCxQeCeViITefzlLCF4ba3CG0t1tw> <xmx:9-G1X1r3SqrrPJcyItotH7yMFQr8KR2u9jXKuYUIXkkCzogtpsAo8w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 65D1C201E0; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:09:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8e52e602-f4ef-4020-be67-2c9ed4fa4fb6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87a6veb06h.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <87ima2bkgb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <CABcZeBOYpGW4ejd50iq7=dTO9O8VL4pUGJyiz2oWwJ2ET4kG4Q@mail.gmail.com> <87a6veb06h.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:09:22 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/D5WGlgxC97xIWrZprfSc6yG3qok>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:09:46 -0000

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020, at 12:33, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2020-11-18 14:58:28 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > Is there some reason why the responses have to be canned and can't be
> > provided by the chairs? Then we could just have as many as the chairs want
> > and with whatever content.
> 
> If we do this (i'd be happy with it, and we could provide some
> pre-canned choices for a WG chair that just wants something simple),
> it'd be nice to stage the polling options visibly so the group can
> preview them before the "hand raising" starts.

A related suggestion: have the poll take the place of the slides.  Or show it in an overlay.  The tabbed interface is quite poor for this. As a chair, I found that trying to construct a poll while also managing a queue and trying to monitor chat is impossible alone.  As a participant, with slightly less responsibility, but more engagement with discussion, it's nearly as bad.

Having chat visible while formulating the poll would be ideal as well, as suggestions for text could be more readily copied.