Re: [Tools-discuss] Request to retain kramdown compiler and author stats

Carsten Bormann <> Thu, 11 March 2021 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767B43A11AB for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:06:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MF4K9Aqi1R1T for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:06:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4663A11A7 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:06:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dwz3S46vnzyWB; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:06:28 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
From: Carsten Bormann <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:06:28 +0100
Cc: Julian Reschke <>,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
To: Brian E Carpenter <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Request to retain kramdown compiler and author stats
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:06:34 -0000

On 10. Mar 2021, at 21:12, Brian E Carpenter <> wrote:
> On 11-Mar-21 04:16, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...> I'm running kramdown and xml2rfc just fine on Cygwin. And I'm pretty
>> sure that WSL (Windows Subsytem for Linux) will even do better...
> Why would I want to invest in that learning curve (or the GitHub one)
> when the web service is just so much easier to use? Fortunately the plan
> includes the web service anyway.

That depends on your personal workflow.

Some people like to be able to do a “make” (usually mapped to a single key press) and get a result without further ado within sub-seconds; this enables editing on the source and near-simultaneously seeing one form of the result (usually the HTML form these days).  This requires a local installation and some caching of dependencies.

(Why is that a good thing?  There is a certain fatigue that sets in when one edits a document; seeing the same information in a different form can surmount that fatigue.  This is a rarely recognized reason for why documents that are edited in a non-WYSIWYG environment turn out better than WYSIWYG results, but it requires both forms to be readable — one more reason for the interest in humane markup such as markdown.)

Grüße, Carsten