Re: [Tools-discuss] missing WG

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Fri, 05 April 2013 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCB721F976A for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y38TnFIeOft9 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9080321F9769 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:1523:d481:1dc0:e7e1] (port=65460 helo=tannat.netnod.se) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1UO5hQ-0007yU-Na; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:24:57 +0200
Message-ID: <515EC298.9010207@levkowetz.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:24:56 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <5151D38D.60207@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <5151D38D.60207@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2RKFUCSJDXGNHDUADQCEL"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:1523:d481:1dc0:e7e1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: stpeter@stpeter.im, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on grenache.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] missing WG
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:25:03 -0000

Hi Peter,

I just saw your note (below) to the list.  (However, it's much better to
send a note to me or to (essentially the same) webmaster@tools.ietf.org)
if you want to get immediate attention...)

Anyway:  The reason for this was a bug in the fairly new charter
support in the datatracker, where not all state information for the
WG in question was generated correctly when a charter was marked as
approved.  This resulted in the jcardcal WG not being mentioned in
various places; in particular it was missing in
  http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/1wg-summary.txt

I've now fixed the bug in the datatracker, so this should not repeat
for new WGs; I've also fixed the database for jcardcal so the scripts
on tools.ietf.org will do their thing, and create the page.

On 2013-03-26 17:57 Peter Saint-Andre said:
> The JCARDCAL WG shows up on datatracker.ietf.org but not on
> tools.ietf.org...
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/
> https://tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/
> 
> How in-sync is tools.ietf.org supposed to be?

You should never have to wait more than an hour to see changes.  For
some pages, maximum delay is as little as 3 minutes.

> And if tools.ietf.org is no longer canonical, what about add-on tools
> such as the issue tracker?

This was a bug; there's no intention of not keeping tools.ietf.org in
sync going forward.  Not only that; I'm working at several strategies
to improve latency substantially.


Best regards,

	Henrik