[Tools-discuss] Wow! Thank you...
"sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net> Sun, 26 May 2024 20:11 UTC
Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C574AC14F60F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DC_IMAGE_SPAM_HTML=0.1, DC_IMAGE_SPAM_TEXT=0.1, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=encrypted.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LexhPbJoKVbb for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xyz.hosed.org (xyz.hosed.org [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED33C14F5FB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2024 13:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0920419C3AAF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2024 16:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.org
Received: from xyz.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIcmpyCP5S36 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2024 16:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-170-253-92.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.170.253.92]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 709AB19C21F5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2024 16:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=encrypted.net; s=default; t=1716754256; bh=TKqh9kg2pTspSK75VLevtg5qz3Sc+F6yft//CVpQolQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=iOjGGusB1tSEIrzNLt1xvwyPqloVF3IlwNwPCdqvq/6bwDz/6gqXb7qd+35DWLaoC kCGBEcHmAXo99g7LsP+ziLUYGoHXdWaADVmtynvfmOK3KwDdelaeuGPLSmU74LpgJ+ UkqLfaewm/FEsNGBDCsv6RIzWvRVLz0l10rHCmVo=
From: "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_56955942-2A8F-4007-ABA3-8FC5A12D0D9B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Message-Id: <03865ABC-F3D7-485D-A59C-23E2C2B92491@encrypted.net>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 13:10:44 -0700
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
X-MailFrom: sbanks@encrypted.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: max-size
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
Message-ID-Hash: G5ESRMKVLGTJMALPE66HH4KLZ2NXRUKA
X-Message-ID-Hash: G5ESRMKVLGTJMALPE66HH4KLZ2NXRUKA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 May 2024 15:12:34 -0700
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Wow! Thank you...
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/DM5gkm1PL-c002A70HQhDMkwws4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Hi, I apologize in advance if this is the wrong list to share this with - I googled the tools team and the best address I could find is this one. I wanted to share a bit of feedback. I logged into datatracker today and saw the states and “graph” of responses to the WGLC of a doc we have in flight, and really appreciated these changes. The at-a-glance notice and the state “bubbles” are really nice UX, and I can imagine that really busy WGs must enjoy these too. Thank you! If they’ve been there for awhile heads up, BMWG is a steady and strong but small group, and we don’t have a lot of RFCs published in a year. :) Thanks! Sarah
- [Tools-discuss] Wow! Thank you... sbanks@encrypted.net