IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Stronger references to rfc-editor.org pages?

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 23 June 2022 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414CC13CDB3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqD7VWlaxjXk for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B58DC15D86F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98A038E07 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:08:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1pTu5MPXA540 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD4F38CD7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1656004104; bh=eSgtuc7HVP0HRoUn8Mz4d0dDDMg7CRiyKYd4KudjNw0=; h=From:to:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=m3/OLJMOcaNy6Y9vGsIg38OFrdTB0w5LoEKQMiShj4QeGFVF/Yutk1eiK94jIdGQi 1lZGk6G58gPuPPsKEssPmdsMsSDlSFl8/19bqWh07+9lb9J6H0AIGm/fKuGkbxxGPb 9t5F+Kk2N7lDrm0gbXwSJ+YmOoNIDN+Gy5u0ok9FQmF49wQ3d7tcGf33gmmNtqsabo N9WI0QSEMwFy95bZR1zZlGBrRrvHoul3xmo5LyVD4xRx28R9Qm+GexK0mZdKW4A+xd Qf0zCebRoOBk0mH04rAW1fc656f5ui4MddJqHw5G7wt88WGkryf1p2eXuhCBLsEoBm oafgxyW8s9Elw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A7C118 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
to: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <16583.1656002933@localhost>
References: <16583.1656002933@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:52:09 -0400
Message-ID: <17836.1656003129@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Ds7tuuKqKkniQlNoYq2M5-hMVi8>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Stronger references to rfc-editor.org pages?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:52:15 -0000

And on: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7959
it says:

[Search] [txt|html|pdf|bibtex] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
From: draft-ietf-core-block-21                         Proposed Standard
Updated by: 8323                                        IPR declarations
                                                            Errata exist

The txt/html/etc. nicely point to RFC-editor.org.
Maybe [info] should be added?
Also, I wonder if RFCs should/need nit checking?

And I guess that the DT already has figured out that errata exist.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email