[Tools-discuss] Re: Kramdown-rfc error message '*** overwriting ...'

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 09 September 2024 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B762CC151093 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DHMvNcA-6W9 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D17C14F61C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip-109-43-241-233.web.vodafone.de [109.43.241.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X2VMY6DW8zDCc4; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:58:33 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-58537BCB-6E80-49A4-B273-F63C76A764AA"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <7D258232-C465-4779-AC71-CF8DA32CC685@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:58:22 +0400
Message-Id: <482B4388-8F02-4391-A6EC-3FF7807746B2@tzi.org>
References: <7D258232-C465-4779-AC71-CF8DA32CC685@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21G93)
Message-ID-Hash: X2I2PYKYO5NLUM4YGDUJQEOMCCBQ3CHT
X-Message-ID-Hash: X2I2PYKYO5NLUM4YGDUJQEOMCCBQ3CHT
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Kramdown-rfc error message '*** overwriting ...'
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/EbboNm1LS2gkEf2mZxhHoe65G9k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

It’s not an error message. It tells you you have two definitions for reference bis2026, and the second one wins. Please open a bug so I can fix that warning when I’m back. 

Sent from mobile, sorry for terse

> On 9. Sep 2024, at 17:52, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> *** overwriting bis2026