Re: [Tools-discuss] Alternate bibxml servers

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 13 February 2021 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C917C3A0CBA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 12:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ARmzeo1NCijY for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 12:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F9BB3A0CB9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 12:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DdMfP4PqHzyYX; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:39:09 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <25aa62f9-ef4b-612f-f3fb-59150afd2d64@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:39:09 +0100
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 634941549.063594-ca2f11262b111d54a90b2d526c7840cc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3D06D81-4081-4FE4-9EBF-31227EFBC855@tzi.org>
References: <C066553A-8CBC-490C-87BB-AF03E529B6DA@tzi.org> <4E14925B-EFF3-4459-AB0E-4ED278F75A5C@tzi.org> <5539.1613240250@localhost> <4628E2FC-F656-4C3E-978A-0623CE813567@tzi.org> <25aa62f9-ef4b-612f-f3fb-59150afd2d64@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/FIuapY5aY4T2osBinoGOJOYqTLU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Alternate bibxml servers
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 20:39:15 -0000

On 2021-02-13, at 20:27, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> I mostly agree. But there are still people who want the set of active drafts distinguished from the set of all drafts, and things do disappear from the set of active drafts.

/internet-drafts/
or
/id/

…could point to a tombstone page that points to (or transcludes!)

/archive/id/

…if you want to keep up this distinction.

Grüße, Carsten