Re: [Tools-discuss] Has 'pdfized' rendering changed?

Robert Sparks <> Fri, 27 May 2022 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA9EC15E40B for <>; Fri, 27 May 2022 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.535
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qFtz1xg9HtU for <>; Fri, 27 May 2022 12:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493B8C14F743 for <>; Fri, 27 May 2022 12:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 24RJRj9a011838 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 May 2022 14:27:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1653679666; bh=QsE6w+HCxnDyklzfmL43j2/BLzTUsRSw/s2GD4R0wMk=; h=Date:To:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=N4WY2g7a2iuXJ57y5NrxZicgmZh3dLx4FOzBRkJGWVjBAGtQY2AjpyNzF3Pn6mx1r Iak8KGt4AkzP5QsZMaEbs6uHUbu8fBCXNf0W+kA2iZubRxJfKt9gMdnD3xLgE4OtXk vZvI/AAQZUqV0i/3+wmf5z8rQ6IWWEk2IhPDhEXA=
X-Authentication-Warning: Host [] claimed to be []
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 14:27:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jim Fenton <>, tools-discuss <>
References: <>
From: Robert Sparks <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Has 'pdfized' rendering changed?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 19:27:54 -0000

Hi Jim -

No the pdfization code has not changed, but we did upgrade the system 
and the underlying libraries, so we may have picked up some changes that 

On a quick skim today this looks to me to be a font-size creep issue. If 
you have a development instance up, play with this line and see how it 
affects your results:


On 5/27/22 2:06 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> I went to create a pdfized rendering of an internet-draft for printing, and I notice that the pagination has gone haywire. Comparing a pdfization of a draft I did in March with one I created today from the same draft, it appears that the line spacing has increased and the typeface has changed slightly. The line spacing probably contributed to the problem.
> I was having a problem with pagination of the first page (see ) but now things seem much worse. Is anyone else experiencing this?
> -Jim
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list -
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to:
> * Report bugs to:
> * Report all other bugs or issues to:
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe):