Re: [Tools-discuss] disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sun, 13 September 2020 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0853A0BCB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjqkgkiEdPgf for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98C053A0BC9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A915E320B33; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-21-40.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.21.40]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09BDD320D69; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.9); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:49:06 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Gusty-Shade: 51381cc52e167bb8_1600026546304_1297372807
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1600026546304:1777618806
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1600026546303
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E3A7F481; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=8rWYPos8+Gr596 6/GzrU9cMNtlM=; b=dHCIPldP0/93aEzddOfQoI/La4GeMTELBxbrAY6xmRGgLs y8p+DoBV8/zKKPUxZraUKl8lxuvNGWUGTqkU17a35H1afUJrJVkV6IB61orBnpFz u4uX6QdJlt2Y9Yh4K3ILXGyChiJoyvPGDEhZ6RHQj0z9j/DsTqG7N9e4B58QM=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F1027F47F; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:49:00 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a46
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200913194859.GX3100@localhost>
References: <8657.1599751932@localhost> <84c8d593-c7b6-4327-338f-9b2b0e7a36e0@levkowetz.com> <0C6D4DE2-F9F3-4C7C-8427-264F34C8C2B7@tzi.org> <26d795d2-3761-2950-4346-62f849d86eed@nostrum.com> <7792.1599768579@localhost> <C73D6AB9-694E-458E-AEEE-45DBDEF623C5@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C73D6AB9-694E-458E-AEEE-45DBDEF623C5@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeigedggeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuffeuheelledtffdukeejiefgfeehgfffffehhfehjeeltedtvdegheejkeevjeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/HiYBPlS9WCB8jka1HwvbvySYOrM>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:49:10 -0000

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 05:37:19PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
> > On Sep 10, 2020, at 4:09 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> > Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> >> Active IDs are added to the repository and the archive at the same time.
> > 
> >> When a draft is expired, revised, or replaced, it is removed from the
> >> repository of active IDs.
> > 
> > The surprise is perhaps that a non-expired, but replaced-draft is
> > removed.
> 
> Michael, this is not new.  It has worked this way as long as I have
> been involved with the IETF.

It used to be that way, then we stopped removing them, and now we're
doing it again?

Having older I-Ds available is very useful for archeological-like
research.  Just leave them be.

Nico
--