Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to chairs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 21 November 2019 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9396E120A3D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:52:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.436
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gpHXfLDqFJ85 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68983120A3A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (dhcp-8a81.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.129]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54BF1F450 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:52:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 71D1C1142; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:52:52 +0800 (+08)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-282330@www.ietf.org/rt> <20191121040335.A47AD120944@ietfa.amsl.com> <253406B7-7911-4971-9ED5-D836606D3B6A@tzi.org> <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Glen <glen@amsl.com> message dated "Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:41 -0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:52:52 +0800
Message-ID: <9898.1574329972@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ICd8-GTPhWrhhMcFd5-3eBuvyTQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to chairs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:52:55 -0000

Glen <glen@amsl.com> wrote:
    > I'm redirecting this message from Carsten (who is on this list) out of
    > IETF-Action and onto this list for discussion.

    > I'm hoping Henrik or Robert can shed light on the current and planned
    > implementation of this.

    > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
    > From: Carsten Bormann

    > Is there a need for the DMARC hack for the chair aliases, too?

Oh crap, yes we do.
and on all of the Internet-draft author lists.

Maybe ARC is further along?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-