Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is (somewhat) broken
Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Mon, 28 June 2021 20:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2138C3A0D64; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qx4liCICuUCi; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59AEA3A0D85; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1391A159-DD66-413D-BD49-F18056583BE5@me.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 08:00:46 +1200
Cc: Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04FA17DA-3A85-422B-B181-F88D278A1135@ietf.org>
References: <1391A159-DD66-413D-BD49-F18056583BE5@me.com>
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen=40me.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/IUbTJjXlryvedjNuQKASrPM7ezc>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is (somewhat) broken
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 20:00:55 -0000
(moving discussion to tools-discuss) Ole > On 29/06/2021, at 6:36 AM, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen=40me.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Several years ago, Henrik set up this wonderful tool that creates citations for > IETF documents (IDs and RFCs) in a standard format. The tool is customizable > and lives here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/tools/citation/ > > Enter, for example, "7575" in the box and you get: > > Clemm, A., Behringer, M., Jiang, S., Pritikin, M., Ciavaglia, L., Bjarnason, S., and B. Carpenter, > "Autonomic Networking: Definitions and Design Goals," RFC 7575, June 2015. > > It's something I use often to get a consistent list of references in > articles. > > But, sadly, something is currently broken with this tool, or I suspect something has > changed in the back-end (datatracker or tools?) whereby recent RFCs are not recognized, > for example: RFC 8890 gives me: "Could not find author data for document 'rfc8990'" > > And worse: RFC 8995 returns: "An error occurred at this point in the web-page generation. > An error report has been sent to the webmaster. If this error isn't fixed within 48 hours, > please contact the web page author directly at webmaster@tools.ietf.org." > > I know Henrik is probably no longer maintaining this tool so I am not blaming him > or expecting him to fix it, but perhaps someone from the tools/datatracker group could > take a look at this? It really is a VERY nice tool and I would hate to see it disabled > forever. > > Thanks in advance! An RFP was recently awarded [1] for a replacement for the citation library generation and access (API and web page) tool. Unfortunately, when writing that RFP I didn’t know about this specific tool and so it is not listed as a deliverable. However, it should be relatively straightforward to add simple output of this format, though a fully programmable output format is more complex and I’m not sure it is necessary. Do you use that programmable output functionality? Jay [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/XPvRg0vSCWUBaSxtX1jSVtsNb3I/ > > Ole > > > Ole J. Jacobsen > Editor and Publisher > The Internet Protocol Journal > Office: +1 415-550-9433 > Cell: +1 415-370-4628 > Web: protocoljournal.org > E-mail: olejacobsen@me.com > E-mail: ole@protocoljournal.org > Skype: organdemo > > -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director jay@ietf.org
- Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is… Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is… Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] The Document Citation Tool is… Larry Masinter