Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho question

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D26B3A0BD0 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRqUF76R5huh for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2948D3A0BCF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id 11so22673891qkn.2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=4RN2oJR+mCrnFFkyW/OBhDwIEBGrEe6DZc33aC8+6A0=; b=fCdhogf4Lq5yXleTamkAwm9E44Zoue2McS9pkFRFkr1utmGd2eQ3+2usZs0rQskhnq 6FX1hsPIHf7LhGRnx5X0XkQXShad7b4B7G/6WlgbzjFfgXD20GILlozpheNx3pklRWpH s33yS1kEOR+QC9y7CzKmAkU7wONuUzcof4wE8FhmTp5kDfWYagjCq/Lvl2UtrjEb3Phd W7NiaKnMf4LoUA0lZJcpc2WXTTZrXQGmXaUtWdjYhZIxzag1NvX9wnWFPNknWvTPvo3H lP8vPmkyonkDsC+vhYJ/DXIqUSPiJfuy7tJc+4annd2hJvkZLXid/nNQJkhOnnSP02t9 9qDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=4RN2oJR+mCrnFFkyW/OBhDwIEBGrEe6DZc33aC8+6A0=; b=PFdF6gcAp0CHMe4Cm28DLQrPjQc3TrEci5C5m+ROLR6/KWI0qZ72r/0330S/LLkIMr KYCE/M3OLyHOGlG4M4JjjmnJL9orgKCSXCU8jRJjgX4v3G0nFUNWLOG5NbMg3mLsuNlu ibvWWyUiuWjfJ9roqeVHg8rXSE/vm4oPhphu7mpN+QkZAV7ptOy0SRLNtRDC40PA15p5 eh+gbH65Q2nvmi3Zl6cFpgOWgfDunVl1g9zl4/f8bxx6bFcIzfBT8S5SYYy9QoLsLSsF yLZUSCT8E71raW6OUurrd1l+QNdXrfqzhPvUYcITHz1oWiVk6XtrABylu/Qna2ttHAWV i7Mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313kOwFy33K7GCqDQMPiFiZcMDis6bDKsV2veLuOGGrC6CqErj6 Q6leKe0SHb9ogLCigE+9KHRSQLlvMj0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+QjywHl/hx2STHl6JGd7HL5W4ACR9c4JeQzW/GehdBR7Ft8lXlHHZvdPBzrlDLGzMC0Ae4w==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9287:: with SMTP id u129mr805866qkd.238.1596037651198; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:9059:d85e:ea8c:7a91? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:9059:d85e:ea8c:7a91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u188sm1946922qkb.23.2020.07.29.08.47.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <93E2EEBF-49A8-443D-A4F5-1A61418136AF@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E2612BA9-74BF-4C13-AFB6-736E30D1D7B8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:47:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6FFFE117-3676-42BD-BC67-B05B1E86F0AD@gmail.com>
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
References: <6FFFE117-3676-42BD-BC67-B05B1E86F0AD@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/IXo-8XK50D2aaK3dytVkzNc4zVQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho question
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:47:40 -0000

On Jul 29, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we need to give the chairs the ability to close the queue, like we do in face to face meetings?

Yes, and it would also be good if chairs could cut off the mic when someone is talking over them—that happened once or twice during DNSOP and the speaker didn’t even realize they were being interrupted.