Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] missing line ends in generated TXT (from datatracker)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CC212098D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:06:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltxkTDF8FE5Y for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 266701208C2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xA7K5GvU012008 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:05:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1573157117; bh=f2dA7DVcMnkcm0fMgZVJQeZrKwFcJul9nXuZObPP6UE=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=h6ooppMuuE+WTnm6IswED56dVcoRH7Zz5xp1SVveNRmvgvGsj4THL0bkG9JbtvsD6 Xb2UfF33CNF3N3It4y5dgz5fyRby0qwYm/He+wV67BYTT8w9hchko+Qk9L4RkQa1Bn QukrTGhd29XRGXenYYiiXWwHY5eI8nkUf/K7DBPs=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>
Cc: rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20285.1568652805@localhost> <705AA16B-68B1-4B5E-AE47-0714F6781C1A@dericed.com> <26105.1568818137@localhost> <E70CD0FF-0294-47E5-873F-5E184A248577@dericed.com> <1268.1568828850@localhost> <B4047303-E2B9-4B9D-B368-2ACC85A06D15@dericed.com> <15814.1569013442@localhost> <3a8f5865-9f5c-8c65-63be-bca31c5f1c86@levkowetz.com> <3650B5EF-A442-4291-928A-2FCB2144134C@dericed.com> <06122b6d-d5f9-30b9-2db4-a2427d299a1f@levkowetz.com> <CB32A50B-D6F2-41C4-8AC7-750E35F4941D@dericed.com> <97e68838-ac0c-25e4-67a9-a2a998b6e8af@gmx.de> <3ef6a53c-e18a-9fc7-8324-67f388acd32f@gmx.de> <60a9d29f-03ef-5842-0c21-6930293759da@gmx.de> <cf651c95-9a22-775e-16d9-ebfdc9ee6ed0@gmx.de>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <6d152022-4218-4cad-7eda-2af13af2c61e@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:05:15 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cf651c95-9a22-775e-16d9-ebfdc9ee6ed0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/IzO4Ur3xF4m7eykd_22CljoP11o>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] missing line ends in generated TXT (from datatracker)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 20:06:14 -0000

Julian -

I think that in the Project Manager role (particularly its priority 
management aspect), I'm "who's in charge" for the question you ask.

The update I can give you on this particular ticket is that it has been 
on the radar, but hasn't been higher priority than many of the immediate 
changes needed by the RPC as we first took v3 into production.

The rate of such changes is slowing (but only a little), and the nature 
of them are such that I think this particular issue will likely make the 
top of the stack within the next few weeks (remember there is an IETF 
meeting in that time).

Visibility into the full set of issues and prioritization is less than I 
would like - many issues were reported and addressed through direct 
communication between the RPC and Henrik, and I feel that was the right 
way to handle them given the nature of the cut-over. As the rate is 
becoming more sane, I expect we'll see increased use of the ticketing 
system for this set of tools.

RjS

On 11/7/19 12:42 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 04.11.2019 19:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> ...
>>>> I had the same problem and reported it as
>>>> <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/444>;.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Julian
>>>
>>> Henrik,
>>>
>>> could you please let us know what the status is? Does it make sense to
>>> retry now?
>>> ...
>>
>> Henrik,
>>
>> any news on this? Any idea what could be causing this, and when it'll be
>> fixed?
>> ...
>
> Ok, so this was reported first by Dave ~1 month ago.
>
> Who's in charge and can give us an update?
>
> Best regards, Julian
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest