[Tools-discuss] private RFC, xml2rfc 2.4.1

Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Sat, 23 March 2013 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F15B21F8F35 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.433
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.433 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.166, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XaLUCgTIXcSH for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D4021F8F31 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=376; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363998668; x=1365208268; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date: to:mime-version; bh=VMaA/gT+IxzGzp9jkbn73fti7Ia99n9cSN42HVSX6Ag=; b=TZt4ZHNK5TKVYMPDPx1skcGkKz/JYX69v+FGFsRZL8JdbarDu9bPLqiv hfhI7FbkIIZtsF67aO9/G3cTkQGPQeJt8y5GDxyyDJ8zdVocx4LvrH4pi FoRBNi71DYC+2OCsYSJlKC0iWIqWUoY3cY+VVwm8/yO6Iz9DzXOYu5MLM s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUFALH2TFGrRDoH/2dsb2JhbABDh2qsbZJ4FnSCZYF9iCahEqB1jXKEDGEDiHeNbYEfj2WDKhw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,895,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="76401761"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2013 00:31:07 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn6-1343.cisco.com (sjc-vpn6-1343.cisco.com [10.21.125.63]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2N0V7lJ023761 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:31:07 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A18D6937-3806-44E4-9EF7-295B55DDA835@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:31:07 -0700
To: "<tools-discuss@ietf.org>" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] private RFC, xml2rfc 2.4.1
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:31:08 -0000

The directive
 <?rfc private='blather' ?>
which worked in xml2rfc 1.whateverIwasusing is apparently ignored in 2.4.1.  I don't see a bug against this inhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/report/1, and also didn't see anything in the closed tickets.  Is this a known bug, or is there a new way to cause the Status and Copyright to be skipped?

-d