Re: [Tools-discuss] postconfirm

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Wed, 26 June 2019 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA760120470 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 231FdI5V_MvG for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368F01201B7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:55779 helo=tannat.localdomain) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1hg7Yk-0007Ki-E2; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:01:58 -0700
References: <11E75566-9C0B-4A55-93BF-6D2AF3C013D2@mnot.net> <cff373e8-3631-1c04-b5ac-5b11d219d418@levkowetz.com> <38e51d14-ff2e-209b-0707-2659e4967a02@nostrum.com> <1F2CA98A-E689-4955-8AE0-BC1F4B9E9F9A@mnot.net> <156f4f16-ecfa-ca46-48c3-63ece3b1d575@levkowetz.com> <9F9AF464-7598-42F2-9EAF-DAE5353C5C24@nostrum.com> <88A9A8C0-2F57-4765-B4CC-CE5864AEE9B1@mnot.net> <350cd758-fab6-83a1-d362-0158fbf3921c@levkowetz.com> <1D19F482-1CAF-442C-8975-3BD05136F3F4@tzi.org> <7533ac34-0716-c202-a034-e470599f8c42@levkowetz.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <36790986-5936-95ff-71d6-d3c62f28de3d@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:01:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7533ac34-0716-c202-a034-e470599f8c42@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FqrI6UD2j062jSV48qcFqah0u086ETdMn"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rjsparks@nostrum.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org, mnot@mnot.net
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/K1wXpSdN5ekBj-Py3qfNQPuk1OM>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] postconfirm
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:02:02 -0000

Mark:

Please confirm or modify the proposed changes to subject line and body,
so I can move forward with this.


	Henrik

On 2019-06-25 12:51, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> On 2019-06-25 12:25, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On Jun 25, 2019, at 07:30, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok, so if the body was never read, that change is immaterial?
>> 
>> I wouldn’t say that — you don’t want to lose the first half of the people in the Subject line and then the second half when they do read the body, so both need to convey the “action required” message.
> 
> I would not say that either, but with Mark saying "Exactly" to Robert's
> statement that a body change would be a no-op, I'd like to be perfectly
> clear on what changes are actually desired, before I go touching the
> email pipeline.
> 
> Mark, could you please accept or modify the proposed changes to subject
> line and body?  You're the only one who have had direct contact with the
> people who experienced an issue, so you have more information than the
> rest of us about what the actual perception was.
> 
> 
> 	Henrik
>