Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Proposed survey on I-D authoring tools

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 02 October 2020 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFDD3A16F2; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2xypYBjPOfu; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625C93A0937; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1kOSni-0005qP-QE; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 21:41:14 +0000
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 14:41:14 -0700
Message-ID: <m2mu14i9vp.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <5F775526.9060606@btconnect.com>
References: <71CCD4C4-2CBA-4AD3-A254-2F19B261D882@ietf.org> <m2lfgqq2ww.wl-randy@psg.com> <1071F4D3-3F36-4012-9CBB-19DDDE6D0564@ietf.org> <m2h7req25a.wl-randy@psg.com> <9F1ABBE7-DC90-4C3C-8493-E89243C73C4C@ietf.org> <m24knepwg4.wl-randy@psg.com> <A62BA403-01EC-4142-A91C-6E675C1E1942@ietf.org> <19017.1601561002@localhost> <m2h7rendtv.wl-randy@psg.com> <DBCBE873-ACFA-423D-8ABF-9D4DEBF1AFAB@ietf.org> <5F775526.9060606@btconnect.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Kn5OLWzvRnhm9au1Vz2SkyOO1Mk>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Proposed survey on I-D authoring tools
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 21:41:22 -0000

> I have always assumed that it is the XML that is submitted but your
> statement makes me wonder if in fact I am submitting plain text.  I do
> not know, I cannot tell.  I do not know what box to tick in the
> questionaire. Plain text with XML markup and datatracker submit '.xml
> format'.

fellow routing researchers used to tell me that the topology obeyed some
simple rules (known as gao rexford).  i insisted that, for the most
part, reality was not so simple.  for years it was almost a war.

finally, one researcher measured it, and indeed, 65% of the topology
was not obeying those simple rules.

her conclusion was that all those hundreds of configuration knobs were
there because someone wanted each and every one enough that vendors
implemented them.  and so each and every one was used.

i presume i do not need to explain the analogy.

randy