IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 19 November 2020 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4CA3A0836 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:11:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id baFt978Xms4b for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6553A0825 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcb31.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CcH6x3cKVzyhB; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:11:21 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <16561.1605784069@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:11:21 +0100
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 627477081.043371-692a4f0eb0f3f8368589c6589d36b2ae
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2E04650-8B9C-44F9-A425-F02B258D6E46@tzi.org>
References: <A23BCAC1-51E6-49DC-AC0B-52D4C08D5027@tzi.org> <16561.1605784069@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/KuhlzqRAeA4RJLaHCh0JeJnW920>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:11:26 -0000

On 2020-11-19, at 12:07, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> I think the list at
> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/nonwg
> 
>> might benefit from an indication of how much mold has grown over a list
>> (and maybe filter for active ones).
> 
>> Not sure it really needs to start with 101-newcomers…
> 
> I suggest that any list without a posting in the last 365 days gets moved to
> a section at the bottom of the page.  

Sounds good,

> When/how/if to delete them is above my
> pay grade.

“Deleting” would be wrong (we need the archive).
Even “closing” would be questionable — recently, the ROHC list turned out to be useful after two years of silence.  There was a bit of a hiccup when IAB decided to close some lists...

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email