Re: [Tools-discuss] some more meetecho thoughts

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 13 March 2021 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF4D3A0C35 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:36:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJhgDYHMZWLc for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:36:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (minerva.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2a01:7e00::3d:b000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075613A0C33 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:36:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (desktop4.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.16]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E82C1F44E; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 1C67B1A02D3; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:36:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <A38876D1-88B2-4E37-A26E-D89E3828C726@tzi.org>
References: <10380.1615562014@localhost> <A38876D1-88B2-4E37-A26E-D89E3828C726@tzi.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> message dated "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:30:02 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:36:48 -0500
Message-ID: <1505131.1615667808@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/MmFvzBBAGOuDtKG0TZX4yJaaf_M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] some more meetecho thoughts
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:36:57 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >> 5) I'd sure like to put all the video frames under my slides.  Others
    >> might disagree, but that seems to fit my screen real-estate better.  I
    >> want the slides bigger.

    > That’s interesting.  Normally our screens are too wide, so organizing
    > things horizontally is the right thing.  But I need the CODIMD nodes to
    > the right of the meetecho window, so I could indeed use the video
    > streams below the slides.  Maybe make this responsive…

Yes, my screen is two monitors' wide, but I only want to use 1/4 of that
width for meetecho.  Because codimd, because jabber window, because telegram, etc.
In general, I have most windows in portrait mode, and my next desk will
accomodate three monitors in portrait mode.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-