Re: [Tools-discuss] Unicode decode error for RFCs

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 05 April 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F143A249E for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.81
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL=1.31, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOdwI6VIh6SR for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931213A249D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.51] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 135JTiV3024878 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:29:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] claimed to be [10.32.60.51]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 12:29:08 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <400FC537-1BA4-4AEF-A493-23DF0D34B9A5@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210405192415.GI3828@localhost>
References: <3C729A10-5F70-465F-AD97-0A1338836C82@vpnc.org> <4790f6a6-5893-e8e6-7361-74657a6735d7@gmail.com> <20210404210629.GE3828@localhost> <AB577D47-8ED4-4229-AF06-7873DCD7BBFC@akamai.com> <20210405192415.GI3828@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Ne2b7gHpUe5QsKB3AQw_2Dso3w4>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Unicode decode error for RFCs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 19:29:13 -0000

PLEASE, PEOPLE!

Every mail thread that involves RFCs does not have to turn into "text 
versus HTML" or "paginated versus unpaginated". I sincerely believe 
everything that can be said about those topics has already been said and 
heard by whomever is going to update the v3 specification.

Don't make me create an update to Godwin's Law about this.

--Paul Hoffman