Re: [Tools-discuss] Draft expiry nags?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 11 May 2020 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BF23A0764 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.623
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.623 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqVjWxgSGtJ6 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196C73A0484 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.115] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 04BFLhmW001255 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:21:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] claimed to be [10.32.60.115]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 08:21:54 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <80687315-F5D6-4554-86E5-22DFE77FF1AA@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <21F4859F-7D60-42AD-958F-1531DBFE5376@gmail.com>
References: <AD0FE9E9-7A93-4CB1-A940-17D5DF272CA9@tzi.org> <a5f084c8-bbc8-12b2-c87b-30bf46740f1a@nostrum.com> <21F4859F-7D60-42AD-958F-1531DBFE5376@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/NjzjXKBhGp4BzvshF9QqH92_CTw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Draft expiry nags?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:21:59 -0000

On 11 May 2020, at 8:03, Bob Hinden wrote:

> I wonder if they are useful,

They are useful to some of us. For example, I'm a minor co-author on a 
draft, but one of my jobs is to nudge the major authors to keep it 
moving.

If you don't find them useful, they are easy to ignore. Some of us rely 
on them, even if just for minor things.

--Paul Hoffman