[Tools-discuss] Chat services - my feedback

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Wed, 17 March 2021 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1B03A14ED for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLznIZD85fBP for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jays-mbp.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC8303A14E8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Message-Id: <046E0411-BA06-4BAA-8BA6-7F73BB048604@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:08:00 +1300
To: Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/OktGsA3dzqH4Oqj3XmNlvzKE0zg>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Chat services - my feedback
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:08:05 -0000

For these trials I've continued to use Jabber, which I’m very familiar with, added on Matrix and used it for non-IETF use and tried Zulip regularly.

My preference by a long way is Zulip.

My reason for discounting Jabber is that the clients are simply too crude and that actively hampers my experience.  I can’t see any likelihood that will change so far as is needed to make this a competitor despite big improvements like movim.

My reason for discounting Matrix is that it’s nothing more than a working version of jabber with the same one-dimensional approach to chat.  That’s fine for a realtime conversation, but very poor for asynchronous communications as we have in the IETF.  While threading is on the roadmap [1] it’s being added as a feature not a core design choice.

Zulip on the other hand has a much more sophisticated chat model with the use of Streams and Topics within them, which has significant potential to actively enhance the work of the IETF rather than simply redirect a bunch of messages to a different platform as happens with the Jabber/Matrix.  Used well, and that would not be hard, Zulip could be a very powerful tool.  Tim April has provided some useful thoughts on that already [2].

Jay

[1]  https://github.com/vector-im/roadmap/issues/8
[2]  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/WAvOx6dkPKu-UanUYtzeNhGjydg/

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org