[Tools-discuss] Re: New Internet-Draft waiting for approval: draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric

[Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>]

I approved the document on your behalf (leaving a comment in the 
history), and opened https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/7651

RjS

On 7/8/24 12:02 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Robert,
>
> I moved the original draft status as you suggested before looking for 
> the approval.
>
> However, the approval link doesn't show any controls for either Sue or 
> I to be able to approve the new -00 as below.  Any chance the tools 
> team can take a look for the submission and move it to approved?
>
> -- Jeff
>
>
>> On Jul 8, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Robert Sparks <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/24 9:30 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>>> Robert,
>>>
>>> The "in call for adoption" as the latch state is the explanation I 
>>> was looking for.  Thanks.
>>>
>>> Before we approve, will any datatracker meta data be compromised by 
>>> the move whiel it's in that state?
>>
>> Nothing will break, but it might make for an easier to understand 
>> history (for people reading it years from now) if you change that 
>> state before you approve the replacing draft.
>>
>> RjS
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 8, 2024, at 10:18 AM, Robert Sparks <[e-mail]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jeff - thanks for flagging this.
>>>>
>>>> There is a different draft "call for adoption" state in the idr 
>>>> working group.
>>>>
>>>> See 
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric-aigp/
>>>>
>>>> That this new submission claims to replace, hence the chairs need 
>>>> to approve the -00 (approving the replacement of a draft that has 
>>>> wg state).
>>>>
>>>> RjS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/8/24 9:00 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>>>>> It may simply be too early in my morning to see what's going on 
>>>>> here, but why has this draft been flagged for chairs' approval? 
>>>>>  The draft is in the form of draft-NAME-WG where IDR is an active WG.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *IETF I-D Submission Tool <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> *Subject: **New Internet-Draft waiting for approval: 
>>>>>> draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric*
>>>>>> *Date: *July 5, 2024 at 9:40:00 AM EDT
>>>>>> *To: *<[e-mail]>
>>>>>> *Resent-From: *<[e-mail]>
>>>>>> *Resent-To: *[e-mail], [e-mail], 
>>>>>> [e-mail], [e-mail]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chair approval is needed for posting of 
>>>>>> draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric-00.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: This submission belongs to an inactive working group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To approve the Internet-Draft, go to this URL (note: you need to 
>>>>>> login to be able to approve):
>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/143818/5a2131db17aea75fff3c06ac4cbebed1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  File name       : draft-ssangli-idr-bgp-generic-metric
>>>>>>  Revision        : 00
>>>>>>  Submission date : 2024-07-05
>>>>>>  Group           : Individual Submission
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Title           : Accumulated Metric in NHC attribute
>>>>>>  Document date   : 2024-07-05
>>>>>>  Pages           : 22
>>>>>>  File size       : 51.7 KB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Submitter       : Srihari Sangli <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Abstract        :    RFC7311 describes mechanism for carrying 
>>>>>> accumulated IGP cost across
>>>>>>   BGP domains however it limits to IGP-metric only.  There is a 
>>>>>> need to
>>>>>>   accumulate and propagate different types of metrics as it will 
>>>>>> aid in
>>>>>>   intent-based end-to-end path across BGP domains.  This document
>>>>>>   defines BGP extensions for Generic Metric sub-types that enable
>>>>>>   different types of metrics to be accumulated and carried in BGP.
>>>>>>   This is applicable when multiple domains exchange BGP routing
>>>>>>   information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Authors:
>>>>>>    Srihari Sangli <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Shraddha Hegde <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Reshma Das <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Bruno Decraene <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Bin Wen <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Marcin Kozak <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Jie Dong <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Luay Jalil <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>    Ketan Talaulikar <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>>>> through the Internet-Draft submission service
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>>> Tools-discuss mailing list [e-mail]
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email [e-mail]
>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/
>>>
>