Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chairs

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 20 December 2019 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8771120856 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:33:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Vf0IbdOmIvp for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C3E12084D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from client-0217.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0217.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47fbRw5sQrzyjd; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:33:00 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <96dbab15-2b11-4114-8ad0-690047430d68@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:33:00 +0100
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 598555978.0921251-5a5131149d2ad4a5e1e3d8e27fa71500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DB2BE9AA-1018-44B0-B926-AF27427B4577@tzi.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-282330@www.ietf.org/rt> <20191121040335.A47AD120944@ietfa.amsl.com> <253406B7-7911-4971-9ED5-D836606D3B6A@tzi.org> <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com> <9898.1574329972@dooku.sandelman.ca> <A7C5D382-FDE4-4EB7-9463-FB2E0884920C@tzi.org> <96dbab15-2b11-4114-8ad0-690047430d68@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/P2RNzi1IiJp3ow51OQW5wbPaWWQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chairs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:33:05 -0000

Hi Robert,

> On Dec 20, 2019, at 17:16, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten -
> 
> We're aware of this problem. Unfortunately there is not any quick fix for it.
> 
> The path through the mail processing chain for the aliases is very different than the path for the mailing lists, and the way we are applying the current workaround isn't applicable there.

I suspected so.

A lot of our processes are set up to make use of the aliases, so in the end this creates  (hidden-terminal like) problems for these as well.

I’m not sure the majority of mail servers are set up to report SPF failures as delivery status, so I’m not even sure I know the extent of this problem.  (So far, I have often resorted to the explanation that some people are too lazy to read my mail, but maybe SPF vs. forwarding is the real problem.)

> We are discussing what we can do instead.

I wonder if there is a way to stay informed about the progress of issues like this (that are not naturally rooted in the issue tracker of some piece of software).  I mostly brought this up again on the list because I have no visibility.

(I also need a better workaround.  I wonder if I need to move to sending IETF mail from a mail account with a ~all SPF setting, like it’s 2014 again…  Maybe I can just manually set my From address to cabo=40tzi.org@dmarc.ietf.org?)

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_node_problem

> 
> RjS
> 
> On 12/20/19 1:14 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On Nov 21, 2019, at 10:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>>> Is there a need for the DMARC hack for the chair aliases, too?
>>> Oh crap, yes we do.
>>> and on all of the Internet-draft author lists.
>> Just fell into the trap again (on a draft…@ietf.org alias).
>> 
>> Where do I need to report this bug to so it gets addressed?
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>> 
>> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
>> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
>> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>> 
>> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
>> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org