Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits confused about draft version numbers in the datatracker

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 20 November 2020 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164CF3A0EB9 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:55:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SQCH5iznwBJ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094593A0EB7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.120] (p548dcb31.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cd2j12lnVzyRh; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:55:01 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-e1+87CqxUfyF8wmxo_DuB5ZAp5n9nL8BW=kZpUsLLNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:55:01 +0100
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 627584100.896705-2b532405741901ed25ef4bf079eaa7cb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <076D4CA4-902B-472E-81FB-6A54C1568B50@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-e1+87CqxUfyF8wmxo_DuB5ZAp5n9nL8BW=kZpUsLLNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Pa1vIG2Sg6Jxea5JemBuoxOKc1k>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits confused about draft version numbers in the datatracker
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:55:07 -0000

On 2020-11-20, at 16:18, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>      draft-ietf-quic-datagram is -00, but you're referring to -01.

$ curl -I https://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-ietf-quic-datagram/state
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:51:59 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Debian)
Last-Modified: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:30:27 GMT

Hmm.  This may be one of those “the script didn’t run” cases.

Grüße, Carsten