IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] How do we diagnose DOI errors?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 19 October 2020 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9D43A0114 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.246
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xWuOwiYo9Ksx for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593053A0112 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603136303; bh=Ilyk6ss/L1aPJROYZzkeIK1UejZy2PQJ3aBpvUB3iXw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Pp++GWRgjINSFpmnyoVdjYXoMGSqzMJmtx9ptQMdmgJQE3DmYcaagR6Ur+X/8x0Rz 4h+oBeNCch0qzCoIkq6k2/a80tkF8GICKgwJQ24DDoD6CGg5cXL/tL+x99GJuslOVC ZyJcIWBX2eHteCNm3BNd+98SqJ5cOx+JNumbSaIM=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.157.37]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MeCpb-1juR9U2gGF-00bNH2; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:38:23 +0200
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <181dadfc-37bf-46ad-b907-853cad3dccd2@www.fastmail.com> <9ee90430-405b-4cf2-b1e7-5d241698a108@www.fastmail.com> <32564.1603119444@localhost> <8b5ebbef-6dca-1f56-0576-f395815c4b40@gmx.de> <9568.1603129249@localhost> <cc0cf5ac-8706-12c4-5014-a95e7b607bd2@gmx.de> <A24AD3C4-9A92-49E6-BDA9-3BE9D8608BD9@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <fcca51a7-16c9-11a9-e957-03dffe510c57@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:38:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A24AD3C4-9A92-49E6-BDA9-3BE9D8608BD9@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:If4tvrPVoXegpvdjKnO2A9OCwVQaj3SxsSNvrRNB60gEOO8m3er VJFTv3vFhrBKreVScuAO7rCKW44k8eITQVYISIC3rfDOxz6WMcU6QQ4lg893yqfk/z4diPA dU+7NNdJwwpJxUzhWHywVbxbcTOhEuaqeyZpa+zlf2M78csVO5mOuSs3xFTNNUZX/BZiIxA 4sqtsUq9KnbhtH7gp21jQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Odd3HVop5es=:Pp3qTaAGQ1jILW35UWbZ5x q7GkdFD2Ey/BsO35sfWczkRB8D+ebS4osCdYf8Nz57SjU9jeZWlsFvF9Hl+3CQtETFHUPFtwo XjkwV6NHzQ6pvxpxOK2v8L/5hUGWHFMSZnim3HLD8gqlk+TbCeiPdHpmPvH/B1VjxqjXGb0gy Q3t21PJLP7gjZGFyADAMg/6YUW+M5J0W/g8825ifzFS6WptPktamhdWDwtmaGWDo4yqv6YuF+ TP8XC2BKrATZTQrLp40sfVGivVJ9eCRkvnFb2lNO7l4hqRASwy90f3Mcq/8VCeVU2jay3jn5u PWbkGCOCPEzIeSBQhBJbO715ZWV9GoC3EBY1m3VIwe4wHGuc5bTm9TkmazHzfMJEMnJoxilQM Oo7QTjrd3iva3T1KO4LHYF0Wj9Fthu92aJP63glpG1i6ZsUPdgbQjp8SEYByxItsLH1+iRniD CCFtU5wY0e/qdTM9e/fmZk25W971bS9KGlhHQnT8HOWSzXVbrOPOIzuduVsBDG6vGzxx29hni Tzm4XRaK21xIMnb3+/iUFKFs5U7QtrQXjtdqLeZfuf5VLoNyOoraT80lqnLMY00Q39Imy0vD1 s3sZFHXFfBmb/6pw8GKNLn/eEzJ82Xcp3ntiSGDkCvQ85IcCFbJ9+vmj1dLXMklQ/NMR/mz26 zJYq1xRfEZG3IPMdxnzO5GhwbbF522x7nIe61hjpvzCq+LMTuCbQ/eh+BnhjJftWCfqTDOj+M g22kjqpGMFsLAH6A5AxwtcsKylO5OjeZtGlpxXgeslhkSE3GTJliTVc4hDuc3EqqHycfoeeOf SLmWG4CmiTTfs/w/i3sWStrp8o2ZP3l2+4e1a6+wwXFI6LCD2UbWmoyKyVao1SgdC6eBFOcXQ BwwdE6b5peke00APXVAw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Q1ed820Nij760KwI30D7fu54E-Q>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How do we diagnose DOI errors?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:38:40 -0000

Am 19.10.2020 um 20:51 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 2020-10-19, at 20:17, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> All the ones that are defined for xml2rfc v3 need a full URI,
>
> … which can get in the way of implementing more robustness in the tools for many-sourced information.
> (Until we define special URIs for that…)


We could do that, or just make sure that the URIs that we use are indeed
robust. Or just avoid include-by-reference (my preference).

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email