Re: [Tools-discuss] Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org]

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 11 September 2020 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910743A0A25 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0bNlDIc5DtY for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3283A0A07 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id x14so11667850wrl.12 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=WAoFSQ3uHqHvW3SIQMWi1+fhku1TGmkeubx3vctEqoI=; b=YrihCQtHxzcb067Nt6YEayIjFzmpykWwbwyor7/AVV/R2LvSRA/Nt7GVyhs+OvlfZA c6qcqvGN/+nri7a7eNOQfSbfuxrNbQhHO7ZK0HrlvbXI9JnpVGQFc8Jrt8MzKI18lyYM y5ePMP8LQkh3K8sFPiAhjzHyY9VVG/7k9wviNH4LRUf2H4kSglaboAoHowosL1LKSmi8 eob5EYbJy9t7ok8nNg/SeL/nxAsC53g0kDaI6pcz1tDq3gBG43AF6nPZtuC4lsR3+D7l BWin2aNmoQIPxML/JYcvZN3dIbxNx3gAyCar9btmtb4Zko+59QIu0oVOI+ew5W18lXxI TEiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=WAoFSQ3uHqHvW3SIQMWi1+fhku1TGmkeubx3vctEqoI=; b=Q2ct4D5VV/Vc/HBTUDOU5nsf0wWSdPNUYGt7+76TXCJPHiLxHkQJS7s00VV8qS1E0V HBTK4oAHyuAGazmYGBm4yg8qx0txo7UkrsP4c5ggTyA7Xv9N32Rb0I6U6+mv8IEwj+dG 7tVW2N8ZB7lzlDRUb/61pQVLVdQ8SOD9bmPgjcY4W5QB8mUAXLglCWcP5e2OuFpeq0ft 9tD2cNaf0geuXHzEHEnkvkFZyu9ZX93A4b0ir40zhS6gqfRFDtuFkZghWLrgCZ9Ttbyd YwBgOsCxNjEp7DlLlazeSRgZivMs+yDCCLdlmhal8kE1g9FMeAnHyBSA9aAHZfrDdG5W 9SSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xamj0z75pNcb/7VsqDAJNlV6ccKgLKt5FmgvVrJM1W9+ETGdB vPyIy2KAkwahwfBXwpT/8Ms=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXSnTu/xg/8nTq+2x5NJxu5xi7cCW3mAqAx7QtjkT/CNunpMX8o2c+dQSTeVzO+S6R3FQlQA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a0c:: with SMTP id m12mr2391956wrq.83.1599834656280; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m185sm4889745wmf.5.2020.09.11.07.30.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <2F82E43A-39CF-4C99-BE9E-CD84D2BE21B3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F634047-E5F3-4A26-AC1A-7F881DD466EF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:30:50 -0700
In-Reply-To: <41EEFFCD-DEB9-4950-95B1-F43ACC73CAF1@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <8657.1599751932@localhost> <84c8d593-c7b6-4327-338f-9b2b0e7a36e0@levkowetz.com> <0C6D4DE2-F9F3-4C7C-8427-264F34C8C2B7@tzi.org> <26d795d2-3761-2950-4346-62f849d86eed@nostrum.com> <7792.1599768579@localhost> <C73D6AB9-694E-458E-AEEE-45DBDEF623C5@vigilsec.com> <3B281EED-CDCE-4025-8C78-7BA689490936@tzi.org> <5B0C691F-EA59-44E9-959F-52445CA58314@gmail.com> <41EEFFCD-DEB9-4950-95B1-F43ACC73CAF1@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/QUNyVgeqorlyBtqIqILXz4QPZ50>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:31:00 -0000

Russ,

> On Sep 11, 2020, at 6:36 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Somewhat related to disappearing IDs.   We had a w.g. draft expire today.  It disappeared from
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6man/documents/
>> 
>> The authors are working on an update, but I think that adopted w.g. drafts should not disappear from the w.g. document page if they expire.  They are still w.g. drafts (that is, we won’t need to do another adoption call).
>> 
>> Can this be fixed?
>> 
>> Bob
> 
> There is no need for an additional call for adoption.  When the revision is posted, it will appear in the list.

I knew that, but I would like to see w.g. drafts not time out on the w.g. status page.   Once adopted they have official status.  I think we do this for drafts sent to the IESG.

Bob

> 
> Russ