Re: [Tools-discuss] Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org]

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 11 September 2020 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461D3A1691 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id txIUF45Jtdez for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52E913A0E1C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DAE300B7D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:59:19 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id k1N1Ib3wHYOX for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96B79300AA2; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <C44C644D-C24A-4839-BB61-F758AA2D7BF1@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E79FCA4-1F51-46E3-BBE5-548F0A07ED6F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:59:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2F82E43A-39CF-4C99-BE9E-CD84D2BE21B3@gmail.com>
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
References: <8657.1599751932@localhost> <84c8d593-c7b6-4327-338f-9b2b0e7a36e0@levkowetz.com> <0C6D4DE2-F9F3-4C7C-8427-264F34C8C2B7@tzi.org> <26d795d2-3761-2950-4346-62f849d86eed@nostrum.com> <7792.1599768579@localhost> <C73D6AB9-694E-458E-AEEE-45DBDEF623C5@vigilsec.com> <3B281EED-CDCE-4025-8C78-7BA689490936@tzi.org> <5B0C691F-EA59-44E9-959F-52445CA58314@gmail.com> <41EEFFCD-DEB9-4950-95B1-F43ACC73CAF1@vigilsec.com> <2F82E43A-39CF-4C99-BE9E-CD84D2BE21B3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/R6Qw7KM9QYhnHNgnTxNF7rfnh-I>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:59:24 -0000

>>> Somewhat related to disappearing IDs.   We had a w.g. draft expire today.  It disappeared from
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6man/documents/
>>> 
>>> The authors are working on an update, but I think that adopted w.g. drafts should not disappear from the w.g. document page if they expire.  They are still w.g. drafts (that is, we won’t need to do another adoption call).
>>> 
>>> Can this be fixed?
>>> 
>>> Bob
>> 
>> There is no need for an additional call for adoption.  When the revision is posted, it will appear in the list.
> 
> I knew that, but I would like to see w.g. drafts not time out on the w.g. status page.   Once adopted they have official status.  I think we do this for drafts sent to the IESG.

I disagree.  If the I-D has expired, it should not be shown there.

Russ