Re: [Tools-discuss] bug in XML2RFC

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 21 March 2020 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78643A123D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmQuhnbttwvM for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A2D3A0C07 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.147] (p548DCD70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.205.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48ksLZ43NQzysj; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 08:13:26 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9F2F694D-0CE0-4EBB-BC7A-CA9BF6F50132@bangj.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 08:13:26 +0100
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 606467606.115072-542f55d449c339c553351ba90826e354
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E680B06-AC3A-4ABD-95B3-89B82975FA2E@tzi.org>
References: <CADyWQ+Hx=4U0++aX6SbgpHsc8u378jCPdJcZRnVSALN7E+8nmw@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EASzcHw_gC2=7LtdhhV7kmsVGbJOZh6gRQN-a9r=BTLg@mail.gmail.com> <9F2F694D-0CE0-4EBB-BC7A-CA9BF6F50132@bangj.com>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ReMlWsJntENl5WoRegGu60snys4>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bug in XML2RFC
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:13:51 -0000

On 2020-03-21, at 00:57, Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Let’s just not generate HTMLized in this case.

I still rely on the HTMLized version, and I think a lot of people do.

Of course, the direct-to-HTML version should be the advertised one, if it exists.

Grüße, Carsten