[Tools-discuss] draft submitted source versions

[Tom Pusateri <[e-mail]>]

Is there anyway to tell if the TXT version was created from the submitted XML or was uploaded separately?

If an XML version is submitted, is there any reason to allow DRAFT AUTHORS to submit alternate versions still?

Thanks,
Tom


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: [e-mail]
> Subject: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-dnssd-push-25> has been added to the RFC Editor database
> Date: November 22, 2019 at 11:46:25 AM EST
> To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> 
> Author(s),
> 
> We have received notice that your document draft-ietf-dnssd-push-25 has
> been approved for publication as an RFC.  The document has
> been added to the RFC Editor queue and you can check the status at
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php>
> 
> If you submitted your XML file using the I-D submission tool, we have
> already retrieved it.  If you did not submit the XML file via the I-D
> submission tool, or if you have an updated version (e.g., updated
> contact information), please send us the XML file at this time.  Please
> attach the file and specify any differences between the approved I-D 
> and the document that the XML produces.  We recommend using xml2rfc
> <http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/> to create your document.
> 
> This should help increase the pace with which documents move through
> the RFC Editor queue. 
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
>