[Tools-discuss] Etherpad stability for IETF and Interims

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 20 May 2019 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD3F120134 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 00:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EcHQfu3fmSqU for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 00:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD68612008B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 00:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (p54A6CC75.dip0.t-ipconnect.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 456qvh3WtDzylt; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:16:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 580029405.8724689-471e62f1542c4ad2145ee5e8d6a03f42
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:16:47 +0200
Message-Id: <8B296553-81A2-4C7A-A2E4-FCA9F5A741DF@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Sk14HE9iizdfS52Z09ifuQis3rg>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Etherpad stability for IETF and Interims
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 07:16:53 -0000

While there still is some time to maybe roll out some improvements:

What can be done about the stability of Etherpad for note taking and other collaborative work during the next IETF (and interims)?

Should we move to a different code base (my students like hackmd/CodiMD)?
Anything on the operational side that can be done?

Grüße, Carsten